Saturday, March 8, 2008

Facts re Aurangzeb: culture policing in Chennai



Artists protect culture policing

By VP Raghu, Chennai (Deccan Chronicle, 8 March 2008)

Artists in the city who are up in arms against the policeexhibiton organisers showdown at the Lalit Kala Academy on Thursday night, have said nobody had the right to interfere in artistic freedom.
Though the police team, led by assistant commissioner K.N. Murali, took away all the paintings from the exhibi tion hall on Thursday night, no case had been registered against the artist or organisers at the Thousand Light police station till Friday evening.
Reacting to the incident, noted artist Achuthan Kudalur, said artists' freedom of expression was fast disappearing in India. "We are all concerned about it," he said.
According to Prof. G. Chandrasekharan, principal, Government college of fine arts, Chennai, the incident showed that artist freedom had been curtailed. "What is wrong in expressing certain things through paintings?" he asked.
Another artist P. Gopinath pointed out that it was a clear case of dragging art into politics. "Every artist should have the freedom to express his views. Art should be seen as art only," said Mr. Gopinath Yet another artist from Chennai, Mr Manoharan, noted that nobody has the right to interfere in artistic freedom. "Police should not yield to groups trying for cheap publicity," he added.
On Thursday night, the police had taken Saraswathi (65), D .Vijayalakshmi (62) and Malathi (47), belonging to Foundation Against Continuing Terrorism, to the Thousand Lights station for 'enquiry' after they assisted the conduct of an exhibition by French journalist Francois Gautier at Lalit Kala Academy's regional centre on Greams Road.
The police initially suggested the removal of two pictures depicting demolition of Keshava Rai temple in Mathura and that of Somnath temple by the armies of Aurangzeb.
However, the organisers of the exhibition told police that they would not remove the pictures as it violated their artistic freedom.
While Nawab Mohamed Abdul Ali, the prince of Arcot, had condemned the motive behind the painting exhibition, Hindu Munnani leader Rama Gopalan said the exhibition must go on as it merely reflected history.

Culture cop: Assistant Commissioner of Police KN Murali takes away a painting from the Lalit Kala Academy hall on Thursday despite objection from the organizers. A photograph by A.R. Anser
http://www.dc-epaper.com/deccanchronicle/Web/DCChennai/Photographs/2008/03/08/002/08_03_2008_002_004_001.jpg
http://www.dc-epaper.com/deccanchronicle/ArticleText.aspx?article=08_03_2008_001_018
Chennai online editorial (March 8, 2008)
Learn To Respect Facts!
Chennai is witnessing several unprecedented happenings. Something-not-so-good happened on Thursday.
For the first time in living memory, an art exhibitionm in Chennai had to be closed down, just because a few self-styled secularists of Chennai objected to what they called the 'communal' trait of a couple of paintings.
Francois Gautier, a Delhi based French journalist's art exhibition on Aurangazeb was opened on Monday and it was scheduled to last till Sunday. On Thursday, a handful of visitors including the Prince of Arcot Nawab Mohammed Abdul Ali wanted the exhibition to be closed.
The police intervened and forced the organisers to close down the show. They also took three women to the Police Station for having ' assisted organising the Exhibition”.
The police had initially suggested removal of two paintings depicting demolition of Keshava Rai Temple in Mathura and that of Somnath temple. The organisers of the exhibition are believed to have insisted that either it would be a complete show or no show at all. They believed in the freedom of expression.
Now, the question is, are we not matured enough to see art as art and facts as facts? Can we wish history away? And why should we? Should not the present generation know about our history? After all what the pictures depicted was facts drawn from the records of historians. We have read it a thousand times.
It was organised by a well known French journalist and he had no personal axe to grind. He wanted to present History as it is. He has conducted the same exhibition earlier in Delhi, Pune and Bangalore.
We should learn to respect history. After all facts do not cease to exist just because they are hidden.
http://www.chennaionline.com/Editorial/Mar08/02edt26.asp

Aurangazeb and Islamic compassion-I

V SUNDARAM | Sat, 08 Mar, 2008 , 03:45 PM (Newstoday)

FACT (Foundation Against Continuing Terrorism) had organized an Exhibition of Paintings under the theme ‘AURANGAZEB’ as he was’ according to Mughal Records’ in Chennai from 3 to 9 March, 2008.

The venue of the Exhibition was ‘Lalit Kala Academi’ (National Academy of Art), Greams Road, Chennai. The exhibition was inaugurated by Vittal, former Chief Vigilance Commissioner, B Raman, former Additional Secretary to the Government of India and S Gurumurthy, columnist, on 3 March at 5 pm. The inauguration was attended by about 100 people. Prior to the inauguration, a press meet was also conducted. From the next morning onwards, visitors started coming and the numbers gradually increased towards the evening. On Wednesday ( 5 March), a group of Muslims (around 15 people) belonging to the TMMK (Tamilnadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam), MNP (Manitha Neethi Paasarai) and other Muslim outfits, visited the exhibition hall and spoke in an intimidating manner to the volunteers of the exhibition about the authenticity of the paintings and the historical information that was being exhibited. This newspaper had carried a report about the inauguration of the exhibition.

A few police officers from the local area police station (Thousand Lights-F4) were posted at the venue, because of the ruckus created by the Muslims at the venue of the exhibition the previous day. The Lalit Kala Academi in-charge R M Palaniappan asked the organisers to vacate, in anticipation of problems. The Assistant Commissioner of Police Murali visited the venue, went around the exhibits, questioned the organisers and volunteers, allegedly made some barbarously arrogant remarks and went out. Then, Hindu Munnani president Ramagopalan and VHP office bearer Gopalji made a visit to the exhibition. Gopalji had arranged for the visit of press persons and TV anchors, who all came and covered the exhibition. Tamizhisai Sounderarajan, State deputy general secretary of BJP and her colleagues also visited in the afternoon. Chandralekha, president, Janata Party, Tamilnadu, too had visited the exhibition.

Then around 3 pm on 6 March, Prince of Arcot Mohammed Ali visited and went around the exhibits. He hotly debated and argued with the volunteers present there about the truth and authenticity of the paintings and the information they carried. He expressed the view that all the paintings on display about the atrocities of the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb (Persian: ???????? (full title: Al-Sultan al-Azam wal Khaqan al-Mukarram Abdul Muzaffar Muhiuddin Muhammad Aurangzeb Bahadur Alamgir I, Padshah Ghazi) against the Hindus of India constituted a form of fabricated and distorted history. He questioned the necessity of conducting such an exhibition in Chennai. He also blamed the organisers for having a hidden agenda of inciting communal hatred. Finally he concluded that the exhibition must be closed with immediate effect. Before leaving, he said that he would issue statements through a press meet about the exhibition and that he would also take up the issue with the appropriate authority. The Prince of Arcot in a press release has said, ‘the exhibition seemed to dwell only on Aurangazeb’s alleged misdeeds and not a word about his munificent contributions. The exhibition would only promote enmity between various groups.’ In this context, I wounder weather the Prince of Arcot and other Muslim outfits were promoting communal harmony at all in the real sense at the venue of the exbition?

The Assistant Commissioner of Police who later visited the venue used most unparliamentary words against the organisers including against Francois Gautier who was the main architect behind the exhibition. I have it on the authority of Chandralekha, president, Tamilnadu Janata Party and many other respectable citizens who were present at the venue that the police functioned in a reprehensibly partial manner expressing themselves in open support of the Muslim outfits. After forcing the volunteers to close down the exhibition, the police took four organisers / volunteers ( Saraswati, Vijayalakshmi, Malathi and B R Haran) and one senior citizen (S Raman-a visitor from RSS) into custody and took them to Thousand Lights Police Station after 7 PM. This was in gross violation of the instructions of the Supreme Court of India regarding the procedure to be followed by the police before arresting any person. Moreover the Police had no business to arrest highly educated and cultured women from decent families after 7 PM. Sadagopan, editor, Vijayabaratham, who was there on the spot rushed outside for arranging lawyers for helping the organisers / volunteers illegally apprehended by the police.

The four volunteers, who were detained without any cause in the station, have very decent family backgrounds, are well educated and they have never gone inside a police station even once in their lives so far. The Muslim who had barged in to the hall, created trouble and threatened the volunteers and organisers, were let free by the police. The police had let the trouble shooters free and took only the organisers to the station! A thing like this can happen only in Tamilnadu, where a ‘Minority Government’ runs for the welfare of only ‘Minorities’.

FACT, Foundation Against Continuing Terrorism, was started in 2003 by Francois Gautier, a French journalist and writer who has been covering for 25 years India and South Asia as a political correspondent for numerous newspapers such as Journal de GenËve, Le Figaro, or Ouest-France. All throughout his reporting years, he noticed that most western correspondents were projecting the problems, warts and all, the shortcomings of India, but never its positive points. He also felt that the problems of the Hindus, the majority community of India, are never highlighted, but that rather, they are despised or made fun off. On top of that, their history has been written in such a biased and unscientific manner, that very little of its unparalleled greatness and unique spirituality comes through. Hence when Francois Gautier got a Journalism Prize (Natchiketa Award of Excellence in Journalism) from the Prime Minister of India, he used the prize money to mount a series of exhibitions highlighting the plight of Hindus today and throughout the ages. The first one dealt with the ethnic cleansing of the Kashmiri Hindus, four hundred thousand of them having become refuges in their own country. This exhibition was shown successfully in Delhi, Bangalore, Poland, Germany, Israel, England, and Holland and in the US Congress last July. Another exhibition on the Hindus in Bangladesh is ready, path-breaking project on Aurangzeb’s times has started and one more on the Inquisition in Goa is on the cards. The exhibition that has been illegally closed by the police belongs to this series. What is legal in Delhi, Bangalore, Poland, Germany, Israel, England, Holland and USA, becomes illegal in Tamilnadu, thanks to our enlightened police force.

I will now endeavour to present in a series of well documented articles based on original Islamic sources about the large scale destruction of Hindu Temples in India by Muslim invaders and Rulers from 8th century AD to the end of the 18th century AD. Aurangazeb, the Mughal Emperor, belonged to this anti-Hindu tradition. Sita Ram Goel in his classic volumes Hindu Temples, What happened to them? has furnished irrefutable historical, photographic, epigraphic, literary documentary evidence regarding the large scale destruction of Hindu Temples in India from 700 AD to 1800 AD. To quote his words in this context: ‘The evidence presented in these volumes, from purely Islamic sources, shows that the destruction of Hindu Temples at the hands of Islamized invaders continued for more than eleven hundred (1100) years, from the middle of the seventh century to the end of the eighteenth century. It took place all over the vast cradle of Hindu Culture, from Sinkiang in the North to Tamil Nadu in the South, and from Seistan in the West to Assam in the East. All along, the iconoclasts remained convinced that they were putting into practice the highest tenets of their Islamic Religion. They also saw to it that a record was kept of what they prized as a pious performance. The language of the record speaks for itself. It leaves no doubt that they took considerable pride in doing what they did. It is inconceivable that a constant and consistent behaviour pattern, witnessed for a long time and over a vast area, can be explained except in terms of a settled system of belief which leaves no scope for second thoughts. Looking at the very large number of temples, big and small, destroyed or desecrated or plundered or converted into Muslim monuments, economic or political explanations can be only a futile, if not fraudulent, exercise. The explanations are not even plausible. In fact, it is not at all difficult to locate the system of belief which inspired the behaviour pattern for eleven hundred years. We have only to turn to the Scriptures of Islam - the Quran and the Sunnah of the Prophet, and we run straight into what we are looking for. The principles and the pious precedents which were practiced and followed by the subsequent swordsmen of Islam are, all of them, there. The Scriptures of Islam do not merely record what happened in the past; they also prescribed that what is recorded should be imitated by the faithful in the future, till the end of time. That is why the swordsmen of Islam who functioned in times much later than that of the Quran and the Sunnah, did what they did. It is a very nature of Islamic Scriptures that they make permanent what can otherwise be dated and dismissed as temporary aberrations.”

The scriptures containing the above message are still being taught even today in hundreds of maktab-s and madrasa-s over the length and breadth of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Missionaries of Islam that are turned out by these Institutions, year after year, are never told by their teachers that the prescriptions regarding other people’s places of worship stand abrogated or are out of date. At the same time, the swordsmen who destroyed innumerable temples and monasteries all over the vast cradle of Hindu culture during the last fourteen hundred years, retain their halos as the heroes of Islam. This alone can explain why Hindu Temples become the first targets of attack whenever Muslim mobs are incited against the Hindus by the Mullahs and Politicians in India, Kashmir and Bangladesh.

This story is not the end; not even the beginning of the end but only the end of the beginning.

http://newstodaynet.com/printer.php?id=5688

Friday, March 7, 2008

Aurangzeb exhibit: jihadi opposition and human rights


தீவிரவாத எதிர்ப்பும் மக்கள் உரிமையும்

நான் கடந்த மார்ச் 5ம் தேதி பதிவில், FACT என்கிற தீவிர வாத எதிர்ப்பு அமைப்பு நடத்திய ஒரு கண்காட்சி பற்றி கூறியிருந்தேன். 9ம் தேதி வரை நடை பெறவிருந்த அந்த கண்காட்சியை நேற்று (6ம் தேதி) மூடுவதற்கு அரசு உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. அந்த செய்தி இன்றைய (7ம் தேதி) செய்திதாள்களில் வந்துள்ளது.

விஷயம் இதுதான். இரண்டு அல்லது மூன்று இஸ்லாமியர் சென்னை போலீஸ் கமிஷனரை நேற்று சந்தித்து, இந்த கண்காட்சி நீடித்தால் மதக்கலவரம் ஏற்படும் என்றும் கண்காட்சி மனித உரிமைகளள மீறிவிட்டததகவும் புகார் கொடுத்துள்ளனர். உடனே, போலீஸ் அதிகாரிகளூம் களத்தில் இறங்கி, சில ஓவியங்களை சேதப்படுத்தியும், அதன் அமைப்பாளர்களை (பெண்கள் உட்பட) கைது செய்தும் ஒரு பெரிய பரபரப்பை ஏற்படுத்தி உள்ளனர்.

அதன் அமைப்பாளர்கள் நிகழ்ச்சி துவ்ங்கிய 3ம் தேதி, பத்திரிகையாளர்களை சந்திப்பதற்கும், கண்காட்சி துவக்க விழாவிற்கும் அழைத்திருந்தார்கள். (பத்திரிகையாளன் என்கிற முறையில் எனக்கும் அழைப்பு வந்தது). அன்றைய தினம் எந்த பத்திரிகையாளர்களுமே, நான் உட்பட, போகவில்லை. மறுநாளும் அந்த நிகழ்ச்சி செய்தியாகவில்லை. நானும் ஒரு பத்திரிகையாளன் என்கிற வகையில், இரண்டு நாட்கள் கழித்து, அந்த சாலையில் செல்லும்போது, கண்காட்சியில் நுழைந்தேன். அதனால் தான் நான் 5ம் தேதி, என்னுடைய பிளாகில் பதிவு செய்தேன். இந்த போலீஸ் தலையீட்டிற்கு பிறகு, இந்த கண்காட்சி உலக அளவில் செய்தி ஆக்கப்பட்டுவிட்டது.

அவுரங்கசீப்பின் அண்ணன் தாரா சுகோ பற்றி மிகவும் உயர்வாக குறிப்பிட்டு இருந்தார்கள். அவர் மற்ற மதத்தினரை மரியாதையுடன் நடத்தினார் என்பதையும் குறிப்பிட்டு இருந்தார்கள். (படம்). மற்றொரு இடத்தில், அவுரங்கசீப் திருகுரான் மீது பற்று வைத்திருந்த்தார் என்றும் தன்னுடைய குல்லாவை அவரே தைத்துகொண்டதையும் விவரித்து இருந்தார்கள்.



நல்ல குடும்பத்தில் பிறந்த பலர், வெறியர்களாக இருந்த வரலாறு நிறைய உண்டு. அந்த அமைப்பாளர்களிடம் பேசும் போது அவர்கள், " அவுரங்கசீப்பிற்கு பதிலாக அவரது அண்ணன் தாரா சுகோவே மன்னராக ஆகியிருந்தால், இந்திய நாட்டின் சரித்திரமே மாறியிருக்கும்' என்றார்கள்.

ஒரு சிலரது போலீஸ் கம்ப்ளெயிண்ட்டினால், இதுவரை பேசப்ப்டாத அவுரங்கசீப்பின் அராஜகம் பற்றிய கண்காட்சி இப்போது பெரிய அளவில் உலக அளவில் விவாதிக்கப்படுகிறது. (இந்த கண்காட்சி அமைப்பாளர்கள், கம்ப்ளெயிண்ட் கொடுததவர்களுக்கு நன்றி செலுத்தவேண்டும்)

"பிரபல ஒவியர், எம். எஃப். ஹுசேன் இந்து கடவுள்களை நிர்வாணமாக ஒவியம் வரைந்து காட்சியில் வைத்திருந்தபோது, மனித உரிமை அமைப்பினர் அது 'ஒவியனின் கலை உரிமை' என்று வாதிட்டனர். அப்போது, அவர்கள் மனதில், கோடிககண்க்கான ஆன்மீகத்தில் நம்பிக்கை உடையவர்களின் மனம் புண்படுவ்தைப் பற்றி கவலைப்படவில்லை. ஆனால், இந்த அவுரங்கசீப் கண்காட்சியில், மனித உரிமை பறிபோகிவிட்டதாக அவர்கள் வாதிடுவது வியப்பாக இருக்கிறது" என்று இந்து அமைப்பினர் குறை கூறுகின்றனர்.

உலக அளவில் எல்லா மதத்திலும் நல்லவர்களும் உண்டு, தீயவர்களூம் உண்டு. 99.9999999 சதவிகிதத்தினர் நல்லவர்களே. அமைதியானவர்கள். ஒரு சில தீயவர்கள் செய்யும் கொடுமையான செய்கையால், அந்த மதத்தினர் அனனவரையும் குறை கூற முடியாது. அதே சமயம், அனைத்து மதத்தினரும், நல்லவர்களுக்காக வாதாட வேண்டும். தீயவர்களுக்காக வாதாடக்கூடாது.

என்னுடைய நெருங்கிய இஸ்லாமீய நண்பர்கள், (தங்கள் பெயரை வெளியிட விரும்பாமல்), மனம் வருந்தி, ஒரு சிலர், தங்கள் பப்ளிசிடிக்காக, அவுரங்கசீப் போன்ற கொடியவர்களை ஆதரித்து, போலீஸ் கம்ப்ளெயிண்ட் கொடுத்து, எவருமே அறியாத ஒரு கண்காட்சியை உலக அளவில் செய்தியாக்கி, தங்கள் சமூகத்தை சார்ந்த மற்ற நல்லவர்களூம் வன்முறையை ஆதரிப்பது போன்ற மாயத்தோற்றத்தை உருவாக்கி விட்டார்களே என்று ஆதங்கப்படுகிறார்கள்.


Posted by K. Srinivasan at 4:33 PM

http://vetripadigal.blogspot.com/2008/03/blog-post_07.html

Philistines brush aside paint of history: Aurangzeb as terrorist

Philistines brush aside paint of history

NT Bureau | Fri, 07 Mar, 2008 , 02:41 PM

History, in normal course, is the stuff of academic tomes. But these days, history, and the depiction of it through an artistic medium, is newspaper headlines.
All through last week, the national media and the self-appointed custodians of free speech were aghast at the protest from a large section of people over the portrayal of Rajputs in Jodha Akbar, a highly opinionated and patently fictionalised celluloid offering on the Mughal king Akbar and one of his numerous wives, Jodha.
The usual catchphrases of 'freedom of expression', 'creative licence' were bandied about with gay indignation.

But when faced with an obvious communal protest to a realistic exploration (all based on facts as recorded in official documents) through some miniature paintings on the life and time of another Mughal ruler, Aurangazeb, the same bleeding-heart, tub-thumping liberals are conspicuous by their shameless absence.

Ergo, with nary a protest from the civil society, the miniature painting exhibition on Aurangazeb's reign in India, was brought to an unceremonious close through a mix of minority communalism and police highhandedness.

The exhibition of miniature paintings, at the Lalit Kala Akademi in Chennai, was held by the well-known and highly respected Indologist Francois Gautier.

He had, under the aegis of Foundation Against Continuing Terrorism (FACT), showcased paintings on the Mughal king Aurangazeb.The exhibition had kicked off on 3 March and was to be on till 9 March.

But after yesterday’s pregnant-with-violence fracas, which hits at the roots of every kind of freedom that a democracy is supposed to be based on, the expo has died a premature death.

And what more, four persons, including a volunteer for the organisers of the exhibition, were detained for interrogation.

The objection of the Muslim groups was specifically to two paintings: Demolition of Keshava Rai temple in Mathura and that of Somnath temple by the armies of Aurangazeb.
Their specious claim was that it was communally sensitive and would 'disturb peace'.The Muslim groups, which arrived at the exhibition spot armed with dangerous intent, would not allow the exhibition to continue.

They even threatened to throw out the paintings, some eyewitnesses said. The Muslim groups had also lodged complaints with the police against the exhibition.

The police, who arrived in the scene amidst mounting tension, straightaway towed the line of the Muslim protestors and asked the FACT members to call off the show, leaving a sense of chagrin among the lay public and the connoisseurs of art.

The so-called 'offending' miniature painting was, as a matter of fact, based on the records available at the Bikaner Museum in Rajasthan.

Further, the same paintings had been featured in places like New Delhi, Pune and Bangalore. There nothing was found amiss or objectionable.

So what happened?

Janata Party State president Chandralekha, who visited the exhibition venue yesterday, is in no doubt.

'This is minority communalism,' she says, seething with indignation at the injustice of it all. 'Anti-Hindu forces won the day. History was not the issue there' she adds.
Hindu Munnani chief Rama Gopalan, who along with his cadre tried to argue and work sense into the police on Friday, is even more categorical.

'Those who cannot stand the moral force of truth have created havoc'.

But he was equally scathing on the police. ‘They had assured to provide adequate security for the exhibition.

But not only did they fail to provide any security cover, but also attacked Hindu Munnani volunteers and vandalised some paintings.'

'The reign of Aurangazeb was one of terror to Hindus and all their places of worship. This was something that even elementary history books have recorded. So what could be the objection of the Muslim groups,' asks V Rajesh, a chartered accountant and a witness to the unseemly shenanigans on Thursday morning.

Prince of Arcot Nawab Mohammed Abdul Ali, who visited the exhibition and against whom much of the anger is directed, in a press release said: 'The exhibition seemed to dwell only on Aurangazeb's alleged misdeeds, and said not a word about his munificent contributions'.

He was of the view that the exhibition would promote enmity between various groups.
The painter in question, Gautier, himself is generally seen as a man of reason.
A French by birth, he has dedicated himself to the study of Indian history and its symbols of faith. Referring to the culture of Aurangazeb as an 'intolerant one' he presents the picture of Aurangazeb's brother as a study in contrast.

The brother, Dara, was a cosmopolitan spirit, and had taken keen interest in Upanishads and Hindu culture.

But going by the despicable incidents, the philistine protestors neither knew their Aurangazeb. And alas, Dara too.

http://newstodaynet.com/newsindex.php?section=16&id=5645

Here follows a complete report on the "FACT Exhibition on Aurangazeb", which got aborted due to the interference of Arcot Nawab, Jihadi organistaions such as TMMK & MNP and other Muslim fundamentalists, who had put pressure on the City Police and the Secretary of the Venue Lalit Kala Academy:

NO ROOM FOR “FACTS” IN DRAVIDIAN LAND!

FACTS ABOUT THE FACT – Exhibition on Aurangazeb!

FACT (Foundation Against Continuing Terrorism) had organized an Exhibition of Paintings under the theme "Aurangazeb 'as he was' According to Moghol Records" in Chennai from the 3rd of March to 9th of March, 2008. The venue of the Exhibition was "Lalit Kala Academy" (National Academy of Art), Greams Road, Chennai.

The exhibition was inaugurated by Mr.Vittal, Former Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Mr.B.Raman Former Additional Secretary of UOI & RAW Official and Mr.S.Gurumurthy, Columnist, on the 3rd of March at 5 pm. The inauguration was attended by about 100 people. Prior to the inauguration, a Press Meet was also conducted.

From the next morning onwards, visitors started coming and the numbers gradually increased towards the evening. On Wednesday the 5th, a group of Muslims (around 15 people) visited and argued with the volunteers of the exhibition about the authenticity of the paintings and the historical information. The evening news paper "News Today" carried a report about the inauguration of the exhibition.

A Thursday of Torment!

At the venue:-

On Thursday the 6th morning, City Express (City edition of The New Indian Express) carried a report about the Exhibition. A few Police officers from the local area police station (Thousand Lights-F4) were posted at the venue, because of the ruckus caused by the Muslims the previous day. The academy in-charge Mr.R.M.Palaniappan asked the organizers to vacate, in anticipation of problems. The Asst.Commissioner of Police Mr.Murali visited the venue, went around the exhibits, questioned the organizer & volunteers, allegedly made some arrogant remarks and went out. Then, Hindu Munnani President Shri.Ramagopalan and VHP office bearer Shri.Gopal ji had visited. Shri.Gopal ji had arranged for the visit of press persons and TV anchors, who all came and covered the exhibition. Smt.Tamizhisai Sounderarajan, State Deputy General Secretary of BJP and her colleagues had also visited in the afternoon. Smt.Chandralekha, IAS (Retd) & President of Janatha Party, Tamil Nadu, too had visited.

Then around 3 pm, Prince of Arcot Mr.Mohammed Ali had visited and gone around the exhibits. He had debated and argued with the volunteers present there about the truth & authenticity of the paintings and the information they carried. He had even contested that all are fabricated and distorted history and had questioned the necessity of conducting such an exhibition in Chennai. He had also blamed the organizers that, they have a hidden agenda of inciting communal hatred. He had opined that the exhibition must be closed with immediate effect. He had departed saying that he would issue statements through press meet about the exhibition and that he would also take the issue to the appropriate authority.

Then in the evening some TV crews and press reporters had visited to cover the exhibition. They had a mini interview with Mr.Francois Gautier, the Founder Trustee of FACT. At that time a group of Muslims, allegedly from TMMK (Tamilnadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam) and MNP (Manitha Neethi Paasarai) had come to the venue, took photographs of a few exhibits with their mobile phone cameras and picked up arguments with the volunteers, most of them elderly women from decent family backgrounds. Later on, the Muslims had threatened Mr.Francois and the volunteers to close the show immediately or face the consequences the next day. When all these arguments were going on between the organizers and the Muslims, the police had not bothered to come up (The hall was in the first floor) from basement. All the exchange of arguments and the Muslims' threats had been captured on camera by the TV crews and they had flashed the news all over during the 7 pm bulletin and thereafter.

The group of Muslims, then, had gone out and protested to the police officers who were posted there. Then they had started mobilizing their cadres through phone calls and slowly their numbers have started swelling. In the meantime, as the Ass.Commissioner Mr.Murali was adamant on the closing of the show, Mr.Francois had left the venue for meeting the Comissioner of Police after having failed to convince the ACP Mr.Murali. The man in-charge of the venue Mr.Palaniappan had given a letter of termination of the show to the organizers / volunteers and asked them to accept and sign. But, the volunteers were believed to have requested him to wait till the arrival of Mr.Francois.

In the meantime, as the crowd of Muslims had started swelling, the ACP Mr.Murali got tensed up and shouted at the volunteers. He had rushed up to the hall with his full team of around dozen officers and started pulling down the exhibits with force despite the repeated plea of the volunteers to wait till the arrival of Mr.Francois from the City Police commissioner's office. Even when the volunteers had pleaded that they would remove the paintings themselves, he had not bothered to listen to them and abused them in unparliamentarily language. He had used worse & unprintable words against Mr.Francois and had termed him as 'terrorist'. Then he had forced the volunteers to close & lock the hall and arrested four organizers / volunteers (Mrs.Srarswathi, Mrs.Vijayalakshmi, Mrs.Malathi and Mr.B.R.Haran) and one senior citizen (Mr.S.Raman-a visitor from RSS) and took them to the local station (Thousand Lights-F4). Mr.Sadagopan, Editor, Vijayabaratham, who was there on the spot had rushed for arranging lawyers for helping the organizers / volunteers.

At the Police Station:-

When the poor volunteers were taken by a police van, a big group of Muslims were seen standing outside the gates enjoying the show. The five people had been detained in the station for about 45 minutes and enquired. The enquiry had been conducted by the ACP Mr.Murali inside his cabin and the volunteers had been offered seats in front of him. They had been questioned about their profession and their connection to Mr.Francois. The ACP had even talked of confiscating the Passport of Mrs.Saraswathi’s daughter Ms.Anupama. He had again termed Mr.Francois as a "Foreign Terrorist" and had blamed that the volunteers were helping & assisting him to incite communal violence in the otherwise peaceful Tamil Nadu. He had asked the venue in-charge Mr. Palaniappan, in front of the volunteers, to give a written complaint on the organizer / volunteers. He had not bothered to listen to the explanations given by the volunteers and started taking notes of their details. Before that, he had asked the senior citizen Mr.Raman (72) to go saying that someone had phoned up for him.

In the meantime, as the news of the arrest of organizers / volunteers had spread, Mr.V.sundaram, IAS had phoned up the Home Secretary & DGP thrice, Mrs.Chandralekha IAS & Dr.Subramania Swamy (from Delhi) had phoned up the Commissioner of Police, Chennai City and Smt.Radha Rajan Secretary, VIGIL Public Forum, had spoken to the Joint commissioner Mr.Bala Subramaniam condemning the highhandedness of the police and demanding the immediate release of the detainees. While the ACP Mr.Murali had been vehemently blaming the volunteers during the course of the enquiry, he had got a call from the Joint Commissioner and immediately after that, he had calmed down and asked Mr.Palaniappan to stop writing his complaint and had ordered the Inspector to allow the volunteers to go after taking a written statement from them. They had been asked to give a statement saying, "We were brought to the station from Lalit Kala Academy, the venue of the exhibition for enquiry and were allowed to go home after completion of the enquiry".

The four volunteers, who had been detained in the station, have very decent family backgrounds, are well educated and they have never gone inside a police station even once in their lives so far. It was the Muslims thugs, who had barged in to the hall, created trouble and threatened the volunteers and organizers, while the volunteers had been calm and composed and trying to explain things to them. The police had let the trouble shooters free and took the organizers to the station! A thing like this can happen only in Tamil Nadu, where a "Minority Government" runs for the welfare of only "Minorities" and the TN Police, as usual, are stooges for the party / alliance in power. The four volunteers had lost their peace on Shivrathri and finally they could neither go to the Temple nor do poojas at home!

- Anjanasudhan.


PS: - The Effect:-

The TOP leaders of Hindu organizations like, Shri.Surya Narayana Rao & Shri.Kuppuram of RSS, Shri.Ramagopalan ji of Hindu Munnani, Shri.Gopal ji of VHP and Shri.Sukumaran Nambiar of BJP, with the help of Shri.Sadagopan are working on the issue and they are likely to take serious measures.

Dr.Subramanyam Swamy, Mrs.Chandralekha IAS and Mr.V.Sundaram, IAS are also focusing on the issue and are likely to take it to Senior Government authorities.

Smt.Radha Rajan and Shri.S.V.Badri will be meeting Senior Police Officials on Saturday the 8th of March on this issue.

Mr.Francois Gautier, who had left for Mumbai today (07-03-08) for another exhibition on Shivaji, is likely to get back tomorrow or the day after.

All are determined to conduct the exhibition again successfully!


MEDIA REPORTS:-


Aurangazeb Expo abruptly closed – The New Indian Express dated 7th March 2008.

http://www.newindpress.com/NewsItems.asp?ID=IE920080306222128&Page=9&Title=Chennai&Topic=0&


Art Exhibition on Aurangazeb cancelled – The Hindu dated 7th March 2008.

http://www.hindu.com/2008/03/07/stories/2008030759280300.htm

Aurangazeb Exhibition creates flutter – Deccan Chronicle dated 7th March 2008.

http://www.deccan.com/chennaichronicle/home/homedetails.asp#Aurangazeb

Thursday, March 6, 2008

Aurangzeb -- terrorist



This blog is written in Tamil unicode. If you are not able to see the fonts properly, please change the 'character encoding' in your browser to Unicode UTF 8

Wednesday, 5 March, 2008


PathivuToolbar ©2005thamizmanam.com


தீவிரவாதத்தின் கொடுமைகளை விளக்கும் ஒரு கண்காட்சி


FACT என்கிற ஒரு அறக்கட்டளை தீவிரவாதத்தை எதிர்த்து விழிப்புணர்வை உறுவாக்கும் ஒரு அமைப்பு. சென்னையில் கடந்த மார்ச் 3ம் தேதி முதல் ஒரு கண்காட்சியை சென்னை லலித்கலா அகடமியில் நடத்தி வருகிறார்கள். 9ம் தேதி வரை நடைபெறும் இந்த கண்காட்சியில் அவுரங்கசீப் காலத்தில் நடந்த வன்முறைகளை, அவர் காலத்தில் எழுதப்பட்ட ஆவணங்கள் மூலமாகவே விவரித்திருக்கிறார்கள். அந்த ஆவணங்கள் பிகானீரில், அரசு கட்டுப்பாட்டில் இருக்கின்றன.

அவுரங்கசீப்பின் தந்தையார் ஷாஜஹான் மற்றும், மூத்த சகோதரர் தாரா சுகோ, மற்ற மதத்தினரிடம் எவ்வாறு அன்புடன் இருந்தார்கள் என்பதை விவரிக்கும் ஆவணங்களூம், படங்களும் காட்சியில் வைத்துள்ளார்கள்.


அதே சமயம், அவுரங்கசீப் எவ்வளவு கொடுமைக்காரனாக இருந்தார் என்பதை விளக்கும் ஆவணங்களும், படங்களும் காட்சியில் உள்ளன.


ஒருமுறை ம்ராத்திய மன்னர் சிவாஜி, அவுரங்கசீப்பின் ஐம்ப்தாவது பிறந்த்நாள் விழாவிற்கு சென்று இருந்த சமயம், சிவாஜியை எவ்வர்று அவுரங்கசீப் அவமானப்படுத்தினார் என்பதையும் அதனால், சிவாஜி, அரசபையிலிருந்து வெளியேறியதையும் ஆவணங்கள் மற்றும் படம் மூலம் விவரித்துள்ளார்கள்.

சீக்கிய மதத்தின் ஒன்பதாவது குரு தேஜ் பகதூர் சிங், அவுரங்கசீப்பால் மக்கள் முன்னிலையில் தலை துண்டிக்கப்பட்டு கொல்லப்பட்டதும் படம் மற்றும் ஆவணங்கள் மூலம் விவரித்துள்ளனர். அதனால்தான், தேஜ் பகதூ சிங் அவர்களின் மகன் குரு கோவிந்த சிங் ' கல்சா' என்கிற அமைப்பை 1699ம் ஆண்டு, தீவிரவாததிற்கு எதிராக துவங்கியதாக வரலாறு.


நல்ல குடும்பத்திலிருந்து வ்ந்தாலும், ஒரு சிலரது, அதிகார வெறியில், கொடூரமான தீவிரவாதத்தில் ஈடுபடும்போது, மக்கள் எவ்வாறு அவதிப்படுகிறார்கள் என்பதை இந்த கண்காட்சி அமைதியாக வெளிப்படுத்துகிறது.


Posted by K. Srinivasan at 10:41 PM

http://vetripadigal.blogspot.com/2008/03/blog-post.html

The truth about Aurangzeb as he arrives in Chennai

AURANGAZEB comes to Chennai
AURANGAZEB: ACCORDING TO HIS MOGHUL COURT DOCUMENTS is an exclusive exhibition brought to you by FACT India a not for profit agency working for harmony and against terrorism.
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IND, 2008-03-04 19:35:46 (IndiaPRwire.com)
FACT India is showing for the first time in Chennai a path breaking exhibit on Aurangzeb "as he was", according to Moghul court’s original documents all of them researched from the archives of the Museums department Govt of India.
Aurangzeb Exhibition is in
Chennai from 3rd - 9th March
Venue: at Lalit Kala Academy
Inaugurated: Sri N Vittal (Former CVC) and Sri B Raman (Former Director RAW)
Exhibition timings: 10:00 am to 7:00 pm
The exhibition was commissioned with totally 40 original paintings and sketches from miniature painters in Jaipur, Rajasthan. Each original oil painting, representing one scene of Aurangzeb's reign is masterly painted based on research of the court documents. The Exhibition is an effort of FACT and while all documents are photocopies of originals the paintings are signed and dated.
This is an exhibition on the reign of the Moghul Emperor, Aurangzeb, which shows Hinduism as a timeless cultural manifestation, capable of maintaining its unique character and spirit of tolerance amidst sustained onslaught.
There are an incredible number of Akhbarats, farhans, original edicts of Aurangzeb hand-written in Persian, in India's museums, particularly in Rajasthan, such as the Bikaner archives. For the exhibition Aurangzeb’s own Akhbarat, records and edicts, are the basis. Many of these Akhbarat are still available in their original forms in Government’s archives. Every exhibit is thus based on sound textual tradition, supported by recorded history.
- End -
For queries contact
Anupama Ranganathan: 9841057563

http://www.indiaprwire.com/print/?type=pressrelease&id=200803027767

http://www.indiaprwire.com/pressrelease/other/200803027767.htm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pP79NW-OzFA&feature=related (Video)

Thursday, January 24, 2008
Looking back at history: Aurangazeb Exhibition
Looking back at history
RANA SIDDIQUI
New Delhi gets a peep into history through Francois Gautier's exhibition.
Photo: V.V. KRISHNAN

PROJECTING HISTORY Francois Gautier against the backdrop of his exhibits.
Not often does an exhibition of Indian paintings serve a historical purpose. Hardly a painting exhibition in Delhi now has any recall value either. The only recent venture that comes to mind is Mahakranti, an insightful exhibition of 120 historical cartoons covering the period from 1855 to 1860. Mounted by Professor Pramila Sharma, it aimed at showing the conspiracy that triggered the 1857 Uprising. This exhibition, Pramila claims, was the first of its kind in the world. Also, in the last year, the city saw artist Veer Munshi's much forgotten exhibition of paintings and installations depicting the pain of the uprooted Kashmiri Pandits and extremist activities in the Valley.
But of late, there has been an interesting turn of artistic events in the Capital. Some exhibitions are not only likely to raise a debate, but also have nostalgia value. One of them is Sabia's works on the romantic side of Ghalib's life. It just concluded at India Habitat Centre. And the next is an exhibition of watercolour works and drawings on "Aurangzeb, as he was, according to Moghul Records". This exhibition now mounted at Open Palm Court from this Friday till coming Tuesday, is brought by famous French journalist and historian François Gautier. It highlights the cruel side of Aurangzeb, Emperor Shah Jahan's sixth son.
If in one exhibit you see Shah Jahan being imprisoned by Aurangzeb, the other shows his son, Aurangzeb's brother, prince Dara Shikoh being taken a prisoner while fleeing to Persia. Dara, said to be Shah Jahan's favourite son, was imprisoned by Aurangzeb because he opposed his atrocities on the Hindus. The disgraceful burial of Shah Jahan on Aurangzeb's command, the demolition of Hindu temples and so on are portrayed in other canvases. Banning of established Hindu schools and public worship, re-employment of Jaziya tax on the Hindus, Shivaji's son Shambhaji's execution, and his acceptance of "hard labour" that he put in to capture Shivaji, and much more form the other exhibits. All these works are accompanied with dates as sourced from various historic documents including Persian Maasir-i-Alamgiri.
Unknown painters
These works are made by some known and some unknown miniature artists from Jaipur including well-known artist Sumeendhra. Professor V.S. Bhatnagar of Jaipur University along with Gautier gave details of the events to the painters to bring alive the barbaric events.
The exhibition is the part of a two-year project under Gautier's Foundation Against Continuing Terrorism - FACT, formed in Delhi in 2003. Through this exhibition, the works will travel across the globe. Gautier aims at "portraying Aurangzeb as a terrorist".
Says Gautier, an Indophile living in India for 35 years and an expert in Indian history, "I don't understand why Indians treat Aurangzeb as a noble man. Why do Indians refuse to accept history as it is?"
But at the same time, many agree that he has conveniently forgotten the good deeds of the emperor in the form of huge donations for temple building at Banaras and Allahabad. "Its authentic documents are in Banaras math. Also Pandit Vishwanath Pandey, former Governor of Orissa, saw authentic documents procured by Municipal Chairman of Allahabad," says Bhatnagar. At the same time, he seems to care little about the religious frenzy India is known for.
Counters Gautier, "I had certain exhibits showing his good side too. But because of paucity of space I am not exhibiting them. People ask me why I am bringing alive the buried ghosts. Sometimes I fail to understand why I have done that. I am a Westerner and a non-Hindu. I just wish that it raises a healthy debate among the right thinking people."

http://factusa.blogspot.com/2008/01/looking-back-at-history-aurangazeb.html

The truth about Aurangzeb

Francois Gautier
February 16, 2007

FACT, the Trust which I head, is holding an exhibition on 'Aurangzeb as he was according to Mughal documents', from February 16 to 20 at New Delhi's Habitat Center, the Palm Court Gallery, from 10 am to 9 pm.
Why an exhibition on Aurangzeb, some may ask. Firstly, I have been a close student of Indian history, and one of its most controversial figures has been Aurangzeb (1658-1707). It is true that under him the Mughal empire reached its zenith, but Aurangzeb was also a very cruel ruler � some might even say monstrous.
What are the facts? Aurangzeb did not just build an isolated mosque on a destroyed temple, he ordered all temples destroyed, among them the Kashi Vishwanath temple, one of the most sacred places of Hinduism, and had mosques built on a number of cleared temple sites. Other Hindu sacred places within his reach equally suffered destruction, with mosques built on them. A few examples: Krishna's birth temple in Mathura; the rebuilt Somnath temple on the coast of Gujarat; the Vishnu temple replaced with the Alamgir mosque now overlooking Benares; and the Treta-ka-Thakur temple in Ayodhya. The number of temples destroyed by Aurangzeb is counted in four, if not five figures. Aurangzeb did not stop at destroying temples, their users were also wiped out; even his own brother Dara Shikoh was executed for taking an interest in Hindu religion; Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur was beheaded because he objected to Aurangzeb's forced conversions.
Yet, Percival Spear, co-author with Romila Thapar of the prestigious A History of India (Penguin), writes: 'Aurangzeb's supposed intolerance is little more than a hostile legend based on isolated acts such as the erection of a mosque on a temple site in Benares.' L'histoire de l'Inde moderne (Fayard), the French equivalent of Percival Spear's history of India, praises Aurangzeb and says, 'He has been maligned by Hindu fundamentalists'. Even Indian politicians are ignorant of Aurangzeb's evil deeds. Nehru might have known about them, but for his own reasons he chose to keep quiet and instructed his historians to downplay Aurangzeb's destructive drive and instead praise him as a benefactor of arts.
Since then six generations of Marxist historians have done the same and betrayed their allegiance to truth. Very few people know for instance that Aurangzeb banned any kind of music and that painters had to flee his wrath and take refuge with some of Rajasthan's friendly maharajahs.
Thus, we thought we should get at the root of the matter. History (like journalism) is about documentation and first-hand experience. We decided to show Aurangzeb according to his own documents. There are an incredible number of farhans, original edicts of Aurangzeb hand-written in Persian, in India's museums, particularly in Rajasthan, such as the Bikaner archives. It was not always easy to scan them, we encountered resistance, sometimes downright hostility and we had to go once to the chief minister to get permission. Indeed, the director of Bikaner archives told us that in 50 years we were the first ones asking for the farhans dealing with Aurangzeb's destructive deeds. Then we asked painters from Rajasthan to reproduce in the ancient Mughal style some of the edicts: the destruction of Somnath temple; the trampling of Hindus protesting jaziya tax by Aurangzeb's elephants; or the order from Aurangzeb prohibiting Hindus to ride horses and palanquins; or the beheading of Teg Bahadur and Dara Shikoh.
People might say: 'OK, this is all true, Aurangzeb was indeed a monster, but why rake up the past, when we have tensions between Muslims and Hindus today?' There are two reasons for this exhibition. The first is that no nation can move forward unless its children are taught to look squarely at their own history, the good and the bad, the evil and the pure. The French, for instance, have many dark periods in their history, more recently some of the deeds they did during colonisation in North Africa or how they collaborated with the Nazis during the Second World War and handed over French Jews who died in concentration camps (the French are only now coming to terms with it).
The argument that looking at one's history will pit a community against the other does not hold either: French Catholics and Protestants, who share a very similar religion, fought each other bitterly. Catholics brutally murdered thousands of Protestants in the 18th century; yet today they live peacefully next to each other. France fought three wars with Germany in the last 150 years, yet they are great friends today.
Let Hindus and Muslims then come to terms with what happened under Aurangzeb, because Muslims suffered as much as Hindus. It was not only Shah Jahan or Dara Shikoh who were murdered, but also the forefathers of today's Indian Muslims who have been converted at 90 per cent. Aurangzeb was the Hitler, the asura of medieval India. No street is named after Hitler in the West, yet in New Delhi we have Aurangzeb Road, a constant reminder of the horrors Aurangzeb perpetrated against Indians, including his own people.
Finally, Aurangzeb is very relevant today because he thought that Sunni Islam was the purest form of his religion and he sought to impose it with ruthless efficiency -- even against those of his own faith, such as his brother. Aurangzeb clamped down on the more syncretic, more tolerant Islam, of the Sufi kind, which then existed in India. But he did not fully succeed. Four centuries later, is he going to have the last word? I remember, when I started covering Kashmir in the late '70s, that Islam had a much more open face. The Kashmir Muslim, who is also a descendant of converted Hindus, might have thought that Allah was the only true God, but he accepted his Kashmiri Pandit neighbour, went to his or her marriage, ate in his or her house and the Hindu in turn went to the mosque. Women used to walk with open faces, watch TV, films.
Then the shadow of Aurangzeb fell on Kashmir and the hardline Sunnis came from Pakistan and Afghanistan: cinemas were banned, the burqa imposed, 400,000 Kashmiri Pandits were chased out of Kashmir through violence and became refugees in their own land and the last Sufi shrine of Sharar-e-Sharif was burnt to the ground (I was there). Today the Shariat has been voted in Kashmir, a state of democratic, secular India, UP's Muslims have applauded, and the entire Indian media which went up in flames when the government wanted Vande Mataram to be sung, kept quiet. The spirit of Aurangzeb seems to triumph.
But what we need today in India -- and indeed in the world -- is a Dara Shikoh, who reintroduces an Islam which, while believing in the supremacy of its Prophet, not only accepts other faiths, but is also able to see the good in each religion, study them, maybe create a synthesis. Islam needs to adapt its scriptures which were created nearly 15 centuries ago for the people and customs of these times, but which are not necessarily relevant in some of their injunctions today. Kabir, Dara Shikoh and some of the Sufi saints attempted this task, but failed. Aurangzeb knew what he was doing when he had his own brother beheaded. And we know what we are saying when we say that this exhibition is very relevant to today's India.
May the Spirit of Dara Shikoh come back to India and bring back Islam to a more tolerant human face.
http://www.indiaprwire.com/downloads/200803027767-1.doc

Monday, February 18, 2008

Muhammad - mirror from Wikipedia


Muhammad's name, engraved in gold, adorns the walls of Hagia Sophia in Istanbul. Originally a Christian church, it was converted into a mosque after the Fall of Constantinople.









Topkapi Palace gate with Shahadah and his seal. The Muslim Profession of faith, the Shahadah, illustrates the Muslim conception of the role of Muhammad — "There is no god (ʾilāh)[165] but God(Allāh), and Muhammad is His Messenger."



Wazir Khan Mosque (16th century) Fresco painting with floral designs surrounding the words "Allah" and "Muhammad" in blue.









The Al-Masjid al-Nabawi is Islam's second most sacred site; the Green dome in the background stands above Muhammad's tomb


The Kaaba in Mecca held a major economic and religious role for the area, it became the Muslim Qibla, or direction for Salat


The Al-Aqsa Mosque congregation building, the site from which Muhammad is believed by Muslims to have ascended to heaven.


Persian miniature painting, from 1550 CE, depicting Muhammad ascending on the Burak into the Heavens.

15th century illustration in a copy of a manuscript by Al-Bīrūnī, depicting Muhammad preaching the Qur'ān in Mecca.[55]

The mountain of Hira where, according to Muslim tradition, Muhammad received his first revelation.

The earliest surviving depiction of Muhammad from Rashid al-Din's Jami al-Tawarikh, approximately 1315, illustrating the episode of the Black Stone.[47]











11th-century Persian Qur'an folio page in kufic scriptPart of a series on Islam

The name "Muhammad" in traditional Thuluth calligraphy by the hand of Hattat Aziz Efendi.[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hattat_Aziz_Efendi

Part of a series on theIslamic prophet Muhammad
Nakkaş Osman [c. 1595]. Prophet Muhammad at the Ka'ba, The Life of the Prophet Topkapi Palace Museum, Istanbul (Inv. 1222/123b). Muhammad's face is veiled, a practice followed in Islamic art since the 16th century.[24]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad

Muhammad
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is currently protected from editing until disputes have been resolved.
Protection is not an endorsement of the current version (protection log). Please discuss changes on the talk page or request unprotection. You may use {{editprotected}} on the talk page to ask for an administrator to make an edit for you.

For other persons named Muhammad, see Muhammad (name). For other uses, see Muhammad (disambiguation).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Life
Family tree · In Mecca · In Medina · Conquest of Mecca · The Farewell Sermon · Succession


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Career
Diplomacy · Family · Military leadership


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Interactions with Slaves · Jews · Christians


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Perspectives
Muslim (Poetic and Mawlid) · Christian · Historicity · Criticism · Depictions

This box: view • talk • edit
Abu l-Qasim Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi (Arabic: محمد‎‎[2] Muḥammad; (Mohammed, Muhammed, Mahomet)[3][4][5] (c. 570 Mecca – June 8, 632 Medina),[6] was the founder of Islam and is regarded by Muslims as the last messenger and prophet of God (Arabic: الله Allah), and is also regarded as a prophet by the Druze and as a Manifestation of God by the Bahá'í Faith.[7] Muslims do not believe that he was the creator of a new religion, but the restorer of the original, uncorrupted monotheistic faith of Adam, Abraham and others. They see him as the last and the greatest in a series of prophets of Islam.[8][9][10] He is also seen as a diplomat, merchant, philosopher, orator, apostle, legislator, general and reformer.[11]

Sources on Muhammad’s life concur that he was born ca. 570 CE in the city of Mecca in Arabia.[12] He was orphaned at a young age and was brought up by his uncle, later worked mostly as a merchant, and was married by age 26. At some point, discontented with life in Mecca, he retreated to a cave in the surrounding mountains for meditation and reflection. According to Islamic tradition, it was here at age 40, in the month of Ramadan, where he received his first revelation from God. Three years after this event, Muhammad started preaching these revelations publicly, proclaiming that "God is One", that complete "surrender" to Him (lit. islām)[13] is the only way (dīn),[14] acceptable to God, and that he was a prophet and messenger of God, in the same vein as Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, David, Jesus, and other prophets.[15][16][10]

Muhammad gained few followers early on, and was largely met with hostility from the tribes of Mecca; he was treated harshly and so were his followers. To escape persecution, Muhammad and his followers migrated to Yathrib (Medina)[17] in the year 622. This historic event, the Hijra, marks the beginning of the Islamic calendar. In Medina, Muhammad managed to unite the conflicting tribes, and after eight years of fighting with the Meccan tribes, his followers, who by then had grown to ten thousand, conquered Mecca. In 632, on returning to Medina from his 'Farewell pilgrimage', Muhammad fell ill and died. By the time of his death, most of Arabia had converted to Islam.

The revelations (or Ayats, lit. Signs of God), which Muhammad reported receiving till his death, form the verses of the Qur'an,[18] regarded by Muslims as the “word of God”, around which the religion is based. Besides the Qur'an, Muhammad’s life (sira) and traditions (sunnah) are also upheld by Muslims.

Figurative depictions of Muhammad were a significant part of late medieval Islamic art; however, such depictions were generally limited to secular contexts and to the elite classes who could afford fine art.[19] The taboo on depictions of Muhammad was less stringent during the Ottoman Empire, although his face was often left blank.[20]

Contents [hide]
1 Etymology
2 Sources for Muhammad's life
3 Biography
3.1 Before Medina
3.1.1 Genealogy
3.1.2 Childhood
3.1.3 Middle years
3.1.4 Beginnings of the Qur'an
3.1.5 Early years in Mecca
3.1.6 Opposition in Mecca
3.1.7 Last years in Mecca
3.1.8 Isra and Mi'raj
3.2 Muhammad in Medina
3.2.1 Hijra to Medina
3.2.2 Beginnings of armed conflict
3.2.3 Conflict with Mecca
3.2.4 The rousing of the nomads
3.2.5 Siege of Medina
3.2.6 Truce of Hudaybiyya
3.3 Conquest of Mecca
3.3.1 Conquest of Arabia
3.3.2 Death
3.4 Marriages and children
3.5 Companions
4 Muhammad the reformer
5 Miracles in the Muslim biographies
6 Traditional views of Muhammad
6.1 Seal of the prophets
6.2 Depictions of Muhammad
6.3 Muslim veneration of Muhammad
6.4 Christian and Western views of Muhammad
6.4.1 Popular image of Muhammad in medieval times
6.4.2 Later medieval representations
6.4.3 Early modern times
6.4.4 Modern times
6.5 Other religious traditions in regard to Muhammad
7 See also
8 Notes
9 References
9.1 Encyclopedias
10 Further reading
11 External Links



Etymology
The name Muhammad literally means "Praiseworthy".[21][22] Within Islam, Muhammad is known as Nabi (Prophet) and Rasul (Messenger). Although the Qur'an sometimes declines to make a distinction among prophets, in Surah 33:40 it singles out Muhammad as the "Seal of the Prophets".[23] The Qur'an also refers to Muhammad as "Ahmad" (Surah 61:6) (Arabic :أحمد), Arabic for "more praiseworthy".


Sources for Muhammad's life
Main articles: Historiography of early Islam and Historicity of Muhammad

Beliefs


Allah · Oneness of God
Muhammad · Prophets of Islam

Practices

Profession of Faith · Prayer
Fasting · Charity · Pilgrimage

History & Leaders


Timeline of Muslim history
Ahl al-Bayt · Sahaba
Rashidun Caliphs · Shi'a Imams

Texts & Laws


Qur'an · Sunnah · Hadith
Fiqh · Sharia
Kalam · Tasawwuf (Sufism)

Major branches


Sunni · Shi'a
Culture & Society


Academics · Animals · Art
Calendar · Children · Demographics
Festivals · Mosques · Philosophy
Politics · Science · Women

Islam & other religions


Christianity · Jainism
Judaism · Sikhism
See also


Criticism of Islam · Islamophobia
Glossary of Islamic terms

Islam Portal v • d • e


From a scholarly point of view, the most credible source providing information on events in Muhammad's life is the Qur'an.[25][26] The Qur'an has some, though very few, casual allusions to Muhammad's life.[26] The Qur'an, however, responds "constantly and often candidly to Muhammad's changing historical circumstances and contains a wealth of hidden data that are relevant to the task of the quest for the historical Muhammad."[27] All or most of the Qur'an was apparently written down by Muhammad's followers while he was alive, but it was, then as now, primarily an orally related document, and the written compilation of the whole Qur'an in its definite form was completed early after the death of Muhammad.[28] The Qur'an in its actual form is generally considered by academic scholars to record the words spoken by Muhammad because the search for variants in Western academia has not yielded any differences of great significance.[29]

Next in importance are the historical works by writers of third and fourth century of the Muslim era. [30] These include the traditional Muslim biographies of Muhammad and quotes attributed to him (the sira and hadith literature), which provide further information on Muhammad's life.[25] The earliest surviving written sira (biographies of Muhammad and quotes attributed to him) is Ibn Ishaq's Sirah Rasul Allah (Life of God's Messenger). Although the original work is lost, portions of it survive in the recensions of Ibn Hisham (Sirah al-Nabawiyyah, Life of the prophet) and Al-Tabari.[31] According to Ibn Hisham, Ibn Ishaq wrote his biography some 120 to 130 years after Muhammad's death. Many, but not all, scholars accept the accuracy of these biographies, though their accuracy is unascertainable.[26] Another early source is the history of Muhammad's campaigns by al-Waqidi (death 207 of Muslim era), Maghazi al-Waqidi, and the work of his secretary Ibn Sa'd (death 230 of Muslim era) Tabaqat Ibn Sa'd.[30] The biographical dictionaries of Ibn al-Athir and Ibn Hajar provide much detail about the contemporaries of Muhammad but add little to our information about Muhammad himself.[32] Lastly, the hadith collections, accounts of the verbal and physical traditions of Muhammad, date from several generations after the death of Muhammad. Western academics view the hadith collections with caution as accurate historical sources.[33]

There are a few non-Muslim sources which, according to S. A. Nigosian, confirm the existence of Muhammad. The earliest of these sources date to shortly after 634, and the most interesting of them date to some decades later. These sources are valuable for corroboration of the Qur'anic and Muslim tradition statements.[26]


Biography

Before Medina
Main article: Muhammad before Medina

Genealogy
Main article: Family tree of Muhammad
Muhammad was born into the Quraysh tribe. He was the son of Abd Allah, son of Abd al-Muttalib (Shaiba) son of Hashim (Amr) son of Abd Manaf (al-Mughira) son of Qusai (Zaid) son of Kilab son of Murra son of Ka'b son of Lu'ay son of Ghalib ibn Fahr (Quraysh) son of Malik son of an-Nadr (Qais) son of Kinana son of Khuzaimah son of Mudrikah (Amir) son of Ilyas son of Mudar son of Nizar son of Ma'ad son of Adnan, whom the northern Arabs believe to be their common ancestor. Adnan in turn is said to have been a descendant of Ishmael, son of Abraham.[34]


Childhood
See also: Year of the Elephant and Mawlid
Muhammad was born into the family of Banu Hashim, one of the prominent families of Mecca but the family seems to have not been prosperous during Muhammad's early lifetime.[16][35] Tradition places Muhammad's birth in the Year of the Elephant, commonly identified with 570.[36] Western historians hitherto had accepted the Year of the Elephant to be 570, however according to Watt some new discoveries suggest that the Year of the Elephant might have been 569 or 568.[36] Welch on the other hand holds that the Year of the Elephant should have taken place considerably earlier than 570 and further argues that Muhammad may have been born even later than 570.[16]

Muhammad's birthday is considered by Sunni Muslims to have been the 12th day of the month of Rabi'-ul-Awwal, the third month of the Muslim calendar.[37] Shi'a Muslims believe it to have been the dawn of 17th of the month of Rabi'-ul-Awwal.[38]

Muhammad's father, Abdullah, died almost six months before he was born.[39] According to the tradition, soon after Muhammad's birth, he was sent to live with a Bedouin family in the desert as the desert-life was considered healthier for infants. Muhammad stayed with his foster-mother, Halimah bint Abi Dhuayb, and her husband until he was two years old. Some western scholars of Islam have rejected the historicity of this tradition.[40] At the age of six, Muhammad lost his mother Amina to illness and he became fully orphaned.[41] He was subsequently brought up for two years under the guardianship of his paternal grandfather Abd al-Muttalib, of the Banu Hashim clan of the Quraysh tribe. When he was eight years of age, his grandfather also died. Muhammad now came under the care of his uncle Abu Talib, the new leader of the Hashim clan of Hashim tribe.[36] According to Watt, because of the general disregard of the guardians in taking care of the weak members of the tribes in Mecca in sixth century, "Muhammad's guardians saw that he did not starve to death, but it was hard for them to do more for him, especially as the fortunes of the clan of Hashim seems to have been declining at that time."[42]

Mecca was a thriving commercial center. There was an important shrine in Mecca (now called the Kaaba) that housed statues of many Arabian gods.[43] Merchants from various tribes would visit Mecca during the pilgrimage season.[43] While still in his teens, Muhammad began accompanying his uncle on trading journeys to Syria gaining some experience in commercial career; the only career open to Muhammad as an orphan.[42]


Middle years
Little is known of Muhammad during his youth, and from the fragmentary information that is available, it is hard to separate history from legend.[44] It is known that he became a merchant and "was involved in trade between the Indian ocean and the Mediterranean Sea."[45] He was given the nickname "Al-Amin" (Arabic: الامين), meaning "faithful, trustworthy" and was sought out as an impartial arbitrator.[16][12][46] His reputation attracted a proposal from Khadijah, a forty-year-old widow in 595.[45] Muhammad consented to the marriage, which by all accounts was a happy one.


Ibn Ishaq records that Khadijah bore Muhammad six children: two sons named Al Qasem and Abdullah (who is also called Abdullah Al Tayeb or Abdullah Al Taher), and four daughters: Zainab, Ruqayyah, Umm Kulthum, and Fatima. Muhammad was called Abu Al-Qasim (father of Qasim) after his eldest son Qasim, according to Arab customs. All of Khadija's children were born before Muhammad reported receiving his first revelation. Both of Muhammad's sons died in childhood, with Qasim dying at the age of two.[citation needed] But according to some Shia scholars, Fatimah was born after prophecy time and is believed to be Muhammad's only daughter[48] (see: Genealogy of Khadijah's Daughters).

According to the Muslim tradition, the young Muhammad played a role in the restoration of the Kaaba, after parts of it had been destroyed by one of Mecca's frequent flash floods.[49] When the reconstruction was almost done, disagreements arose as to who would have the honor of lifting the Black Stone into place and different clans were about to take up arms against each other. One of the elders suggested they take the advice of the first one who entered the gates of the Haram. This happened to be Muhammad. He spread out his cloak, put the stone in the middle and had members of the four major clans raise it to its destined position. The cloak became an important symbol for later poets and writers.[50]


Beginnings of the Qur'an
See also: Wahy

Muhammad often retreated to Mount Hira near Mecca. Islamic tradition holds that the angel Gabriel began communicating with him here in the year 610 and commanded Muhammad to recite the following verses:[51]

Proclaim! (or read!) in the name of thy Lord and Cherisher, Who created- Created man, out of a (mere) clot of congealed blood: Proclaim! And thy Lord is Most Bountiful,- He Who taught (the use of) the pen,- Taught man that which he knew not.(Surah 96:1-5)

Upon receiving his first revelations he was deeply distressed. When he returned home he related the event to his wife Khadijah, and told her that he contemplated throwing himself off the top of a mountain.[52] He was consoled and reassured by Khadijah and her Christian cousin, Waraqah ibn Nawfal. This was followed by a pause of three years during which Muhammad gave himself up further to prayers and spiritual practices. When the revelations resumed he was reassured and commanded to begin preaching (Surah 93:1-11).[53]

According to Welch, these revelations were accompanied by mysterious seizures as the reports are unlikely to have been forged by later Muslims.[16] Muhammad was confident that he could distinguish his own thoughts from these messages.[54]


Early years in Mecca

According to the Muslim tradition, Muhammad's wife Khadija was the first to believe he was a prophet.[56] She was soon followed by Muhammad's ten-year-old cousin Ali ibn Abi Talib, close friend Abu Bakr, and adopted son Zaid. The identity of the first male Muslim is a controversial subject.[56]

Around 613, Muhammad began to preach amongst Meccans most of whom ignored it and a few mocked him, while some others became his followers. There were three main groups of early converts to Islam: younger brothers and sons of great merchants; people who had fallen out of the first rank in their tribe or failed to attain it; and the weak, mostly unprotected foreigners..[57]

According to Ibn Sad, in this period, the Quraysh "did not criticize what he [Muhammad] said… When he passed by them as they sat in groups, they would point out to him and say "There is the youth of the clan of Abd al-Muttalib who speaks (things) from heaven."[10] According to Welch, the Qur'anic verses at this time were not "based on a dogmatic conception of monotheism but on a strong general moral and religious appeal". Its key themes include the moral responsibility of man towards his creator; the resurrection of dead, God's final judgment followed by vivid descriptions of the tortures in hell and pleasures in Paradise; use of the nature and wonders of everyday life, particularly the phenomenon of man, as signs of God to show the existence of a greater power who will take into account the greed of people and their suppression of the poor. Religious duties required of the believers at this time were few: belief in God, asking for forgiveness of sins, offering frequent prayers, assisting others particularly those in need, rejecting cheating and the love of wealth (considered to be significant in the commercial life of Mecca), being chaste and not to kill new-born girls.[58]


Opposition in Mecca
See also: Migration to Abyssinia
According to Ibn Sad, the opposition in Mecca started when Muhammad delivered verses that "spoke shamefully of the idols they [the Meccans] worshiped other than …[God] and mentioned the perdition of their fathers who died in disbelief."[10] According to Watt, as the ranks of Muhammad's followers swelled, he became a threat to the local tribes and the rulers of the city, whose wealth rested upon the Kaaba, the focal point of Meccan religious life, which Muhammad threatened to overthrow. Muhammad’s denunciation of the Meccan traditional religion was especially offensive to his own tribe, the Quraysh, as they were the guardians of the Ka'aba.[57]

The great merchants tried (but failed) to come to some arrangements with Muhammad in exchange for abandoning his preaching. They offered him admission into the inner circle of merchants and establishing his position in the circle by an advantageous marriage.[57] Some western scholars suggest that the opposition became an open breach after the incident of the satanic verses (see below).[59]

Tradition records at great length the persecution and ill-treatment of Muhammad and his followers.[16] Sumayya bint Khubbat, a slave of Abū Jahl and a prominent Meccan leader, is famous as the first martyr of Islam, having been killed with a spear by her master when she refused to give up her faith. Bilal, another Muslim slave, was tortured by Umayya ibn khalaf who placed a heavy rock on his chest to force his conversion.[60][61] Apart from insults, Muhammad was protected from physical harm due to belonging to the Banu Hashim.[62][63]

In 615, some of Muhammad's followers emigrated to the Ethiopian Kingdom of Aksum and founded a small colony there under the protection of the Christian Ethiopian king.[16] While the traditions view the persecutions of Meccans to have played the major role in the emigration, William Montgomery Watt states "there is reason to believe that some sort of division within the embryonic Muslim community played a role and that some of the emigrants may have gone to Abyssinia to engage in trade, possibly in competition with prominent merchant families in Mecca."[16]

The earliest surviving traditions describe Muhammad's involvement at this time in an episode that has come to be known as the "Story of the Cranes" -- a story that some scholars have dubbed the "satanic verses." The account holds that Muhammad pronounced a verse acknowledging the existence of three Meccan goddesses considered to be the daughters of Allah, praising them, and appealing for their intercession. According to these accounts, Muhammad later retracted the verses, saying Gabriel had instructed him to do so.[64] Islamic scholars vigorously objected to the historicity of the incident as early as the tenth century CE[65] In any event, the relations between the Muslims and their pagan fellow-tribesmen rapidly deteriorated.

According to tradition, the leaders of Makhzum and Abd Shams, two important clans of Quraysh, declared a public boycott against the clan of Banu Hashim, their commercial rival, in order to put pressure on the clan to withdraw its protection from Muhammad. The boycott lasted for three years but eventually collapsed mainly because it was not achieving its purpose.[66][67]


Last years in Mecca
In 619, the "year of sorrows," both Muhammad's wife Khadijah and his uncle Abu Talib died. With the death of Abu Talib, the leadership of the clan of Banu Hashim was passed to Abu Lahab who was an inveterate enemy of Muhammad. Soon afterwards Abu Lahab withdrew the clan's protection from Muhammad. This placed Muhammad under the danger of death since the withdrawal of clan protection implied that the blood revenge for his killing would not be exacted. Muhammad then tried to find a protector for himself in another important city in Arabia, Ta'if, but his effort failed and further brought him into physical danger.[67][16] Muhammad was forced to return to Mecca. A Meccan man named Mut'im b. Adi (and the protection of the tribe of Banu Nawfal) made it possible for him safely to re-enter his native city.[16][67]

Many people were visiting Mecca on business or as pilgrims to the Kaaba. Muhammad took this opportunity to look for a new home for himself and his followers. After several unsuccessful negotiations, he found hope with some men from Yathrib (later called Medina).[16] The Arab population of Yathrib were somewhat familiar with monotheism because a Jewish community existed in that city.[16]


Isra and Mi'raj
Main article: Isra and Mi'raj


Some time in 620, Muhammad told his followers that he had experienced the Isra and Miraj, a miraculous journey said to have been accomplished in one night along with the angel Gabriel. In the first part of the journey, the Isra, he is said to have travelled from Mecca to "the farthest mosque" (in Arabic: masjid al-aqsa), which Muslims usually identify with the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem. In the second part, the Miraj, Muhammad is said to have toured heaven and hell, and spoken with earlier prophets, such as Abraham, Moses, and Jesus. Ibn Ishaq, author of first biography of Muhammad, presents this event as a spiritual experience while later historians like Al-Tabari and Ibn Kathir present it as a physical journey.[68] Those Muslims subscribing to the latter view consider the Foundation Stone under the Dome of the Rock to be the site from which Muhammad ascended to heaven on the Buraq.[citation needed]


Muhammad in Medina

Hijra to Medina
Main articles: Migration to Medina and Muhammad in Medina
A delegation from Medina, consisting of the representatives of the twelve important clans of Medina, invited Muhammad as a neutral outsider to Medina to serve as the chief arbitrator for the entire community.[69][70] There was fighting in Yathrib mainly involving its Arab and Jewish inhabitants for around a hundred years before 620.[69] The recurring slaughters and disagreements over the resulting claims, especially after the battle of Bu'ath in which all the clans were involved, made it obvious to them that the tribal conceptions of blood-feud and an eye for an eye were no longer workable unless "there was one man with authority to adjudicate in disputed cases."[69]

Muhammad instructed his followers to emigrate to Medina until virtually all of his followers had left Mecca. Being alarmed at the departure of Muslims, according to the tradition, the Meccans plotted to assassin Muhammad. With the help of Ali, however, Muhammad fooled the Meccans who were watching him, and secretly slipped away from the town.[71] By 622, Muhammad had emigrated to Medina, then known as Yathrib, a large agricultural oasis. [72] Following the emigration, the Meccans seized the properties of the Muslim emigrants in Mecca.[73]

Wikisource has original text related to this article:
Constitution of MedinaAmong the things Muhammad did in order to settle down the longstanding grievances among the tribes of Medina was drafting a document known as the Constitution of Medina (date debated), "establishing a kind of alliance or federation" among the eight Medinan tribes and Muslim emigrants from Mecca, which specified the rights and duties of all citizens and the relationship of the different communities in Medina (including that of the Muslim community to other communities specifically the Jews and other "Peoples of the Book").[69][70] The community defined in the Constitution of Medina, umma, had a religious outlook but was also shaped by the practical considerations and substantially preserved the legal forms of the old Arab tribes.[58]

The first group of pagan converts to Islam in Medina were the clans who had not produced great leaders for themselves but had suffered from warlike leaders from other clans. This was followed by the general acceptance of Islam by the pagan population of Medina, apart from some exception. This was according to Ibn Ishaq influenced by the conversion of Sa'd ibn Muadh, one of the prominent leaders in Medina to Islam. The Jewish clans however kept aloof from Islam though in the course of time there were a few converts from them.[74] After his migration to Medina, Muhammad's attitude towards Christians and Jews changed. Norman Stillman states:[75]

During this fateful time, fraught with tension after the Hidjra [migration to Medina], when Muhammad encountered contradiction, ridicule and rejection from the Jewish scholars in Medina, he came to adopt a radically more negative view of the people of the Book who had received earlier scriptures. This attitude was already evolving in the third Meccan period as the Prophet became more aware of the antipathy between Jews and Christians and the disagreements and strife amongst members of the same religion. The Qur'an at this time states that it will "relate [correctly] to the Children of Israel most of that about which they differ" (XXVII, 76).


Beginnings of armed conflict
The neutrality of this section is disputed.
Please see the discussion on the talk page.
This section has been tagged since December 2007.

Economically uprooted and with no available profession besides that of arms, the Muslim migrants turned to raiding Meccan caravans for their livelihood, thus initiating armed conflict between the Muslims and Mecca.[76][77][78][79] Muhammad delivered Qur'anic verses permitting the Muslims to fight the Meccans (see Qur'an 22:39–40).[80] These attacks provoked and pressured Mecca by interfering with trade, and allowed the Muslims to acquire wealth, power and prestige while working toward their ultimate goal of inducing Mecca's submission to the new faith.[81][82] In March of 624, Muhammad led some three hundred warriors in a raid on a Meccan merchant caravan. The Muslims set an ambush for the Meccans at Badr.[83] Aware of the plan, the Meccan caravan eluded Muslims. Meanwhile a force from Mecca was sent to protect the caravan. The force did not return home upon hearing that the caravan was safe. The battle of Badr began in March of 624.[84] Though outnumbered more than three to one, the Muslims won the battle, killing at least forty-five Meccans and taking seventy prisoners for ransom; only fourteen Muslims died. They had also succeeded in killing many of the Meccan leaders, including Abu Jahl.[85] Muhammad himself did not fight, directing the battle from a nearby hut alongside Abu Bakr.[86] In the weeks following the battle, Meccans visited Medina in order to ransom captives from Badr. Many of these had belonged to wealthy families, and were likely ransomed for a considerable sum. Those captives who were not sufficiently influential or wealthy were usually freed without ransom. Muhammad's decision was that those who were wealthy but did not ransom themselves should be killed.[87][88] Muhammad ordered the immediate execution of two men without entertaining offers for their release.[88] One of the men, Uqba ibn Abu Mu'ayt, had written verses about Muhammad, and the other had said that his own stories about Persians were as good as the tales of the Qur'an.[87] The raiders had won much booty, and the battle helped to stabilize the Medinan community.[89] Muhammad and his followers saw in the victory a confirmation of their faith. [16]

With the early general conversion of Medinian pagans to Islam, the pagan opposition in Medina was never of prime importance in the affairs of Medina. Those remaining pagans in Medina were very bitter about the advance of Islam. In particular Asma bint Marwan and Abu Afak had composed verses taunting and insulting some of the Muslims. These two were assassinated and Muhammad did not disapprove of it. No one dared to take vengeance on them, and some of the members of the clan of Asma bint Marwan who had previously converted to Islam in secret, now professed Islam openly. This marked an end to the overt opposition to Muhammad among the pagans in Medina.[90]

Muhammad expelled from Medina the Banu Qaynuqa, one of the three main Jewish tribes.[16] Jewish opposition "may well have been for political as well as religious reasons".[91] On religious grounds, the Jews were skeptical of the possibility of a non-Jewish prophet,[92] and also had concerns about possible incompatibilities between the Qur'an and their own scriptures.[92][93] The Qur'an's response regarding the possibility of a non-Jew being a prophet was that Abraham was not a Jew. The Qur'an also stated that it was "restoring the pure monotheism of Abraham which had been corrupted in various, clearly specified, ways by Jews and Christians".[92] According to Francis Edward Peters, "The Jews also began secretly to connive with Muhammad's enemies in Mecca to overthrow him."[94]

Following the battle of Badr, Muhammad also made mutual-aid alliances with a number of Bedouin tribes to protect his community from attacks from the northern part of Hijaz.[16]


Conflict with Mecca
The neutrality of this section is disputed.
Please see the discussion on the talk page.
This section has been tagged since December 2007.
Timeline of Muhammad
Important dates and locations in the life of Muhammad
c. 569 Death of his father, `Abd Allah
c. 570 Possible date of birth, April 20: Mecca
576 Death of Mother
578 Death of Grandfather
c. 583 Takes trading journeys to Syria
c. 595 Meets and marries Khadijah
610 First reports of Qur'anic revelation
c. 610 Appears as Prophet of Islam
c. 613 Begins spreading message of Islam publicly
c. 614 Begins to gather following in Mecca
c. 615 Emigration of Muslims to Ethiopia
616 Banu Hashim clan boycott begins
c. 618 Medinan Civil War
619 Banu Hashim clan boycott ends
619 The year of sorrows: Khadijah and Abu Talib die
c. 620 Isra and Miraj
622 Emigrates to Medina (Hijra)
624 Battle of Badr: Muslims defeat Meccans
624 Expulsion of Banu Qaynuqa
625 Battle of Uhud: Meccans defeat Muslims
625 Expulsion of Banu Nadir
626 Attack on Dumat al-Jandal (Syria)
627 Battle of the Trench
627 Destruction of Banu Qurayza
627 Subjugation of Dumat al-Jandal
628 Treaty of Hudaybiyya
c. 628 Gains access to Meccan shrine Kaaba
628 Conquest of the Khaybar oasis
629 First hajj pilgrimage
629 Attack on Byzantine empire fails: Battle of Mu'tah
630 Attacks and bloodlessly captures Mecca
c. 630 Battle of Hunayn
c. 630 Siege of Taif
630 Conquest of Mecca
c. 631 Rules most of the Arabian peninsula
c. 632 Attacks the Ghassanids: Tabuk
632 Farewell hajj pilgrimage
632 Death (June 8): Medina
The attack at Badr committed Muhammad to total war with Meccans, who were now anxious to avenge their defeat. To maintain their economic prosperity, the Meccans needed to restore their prestige, which had been lost at Badr.[95] The Meccans sent out a small party for a raid on Medina to restore confidence and reconnoiter. The party retreated immediately after a surprise and speedy attack but with minor damages; there was no combat.[96] In the ensuing months, Muhammad led expeditions on tribes allied with Mecca and sent out a raid on a Meccan caravan.[97] Abu Sufyan subsequently gathered an army of three thousand men and set out for an attack on Medina.[98] They were accompanied by some prominent women of Mecca, such as Hind bint Utbah, Abu Sufyan's wife, who had lost family members at Badr. These women provided encouragement in keeping with Bedouin custom, calling out the names of the dead at Badr.[99]

A scout alerted Muhammad of the Meccan army's presence and numbers a day later. The next morning, at the Muslim conference of war, there was dispute over how best to repel the Meccans. Muhammad and many of the senior figures suggested that it would be safer to fight within Medina and take advantage of its heavily fortified strongholds. Younger Muslims argued that the Meccans were destroying their crops, and that huddling in the strongholds would destroy Muslim prestige. Muhammad eventually conceded to the wishes of the latter, and readied the Muslim force for battle. Thus, Muhammad led his force outside to the mountain of Uhud (where the Meccans had camped) and fought the Battle of Uhud on March 23.[100][101]

Although the Muslim army had the best of the early encounters, indiscipline on the part of strategically placed archers led to a Muslim defeat, with 75 Muslims killed. However, the Meccans failed to achieve their aim of destroying the Muslims completely.[102] The Meccans did not occupy the town and withdrew to Mecca because they could not attack on Muhammad's position again for military loss, low morale and possibility of Muslim resistance in the town. There was also hope that Abd-Allah ibn Ubayy leading a group of Muslims in Medina could be won over by diplomacy.[103] Following the defeat, Muhammad's detractors in Medina said that if the victory at Badr was proof of the genuineness of his mission, then the defeat at Uhud was proof that his mission was not genuine.[104] Muhammad subsequently delivered Qur'anic verses ([Qur'an 3:133] and [Qur'an 3:160]) indicating that the loss was partly a punishment for disobedience and partly a test for steadfastness.[105]


The rousing of the nomads
In the battle of Uhud, the Meccans had collected all the available men from Quraysh and the neighboring tribes friendly to them but had not succeeded in the destruction of the Muslim community. In order to raise a more powerful army, Abu Sufyan attracted the support of the great nomadic tribes to the north and east of Medina, using propaganda about Muhammad's weakness, promises of booty, memories of the prestige of Quraysh and straight bribes.[106]

Muhammad's policy in the next two years after the battle of Uhud was to prevent alliances against him as much as he could. Whenever alliances of tribesmen against Medina was formed, he sent out an expedition to break it up.[106] When Muhammad heard of men massing with hostile intentions against Medina, he reacted with severity.[107] One example is the assassination of Ka'b ibn Ashraf, a member of the Jewish tribe of Banu Nadir who had gone to Mecca and written poems that had helped rouse the Meccans' grief, anger and desire for revenge after the battle of Badr.[108] Around a year later, Muhammad expelled the Jewish Banu Nadir from Medina (see the main article for details).[109]

Muhammad's attempts to prevent formation of confederation against him was not successful though he was able to increase his own forces and stop many tribes from joining the confederation.[110]

A notable incident in this period is the accusation of adultery made against Aisha, Muhammad's wife. Aisha was exonerated from the accusations when Muhammad announced that he had received a revelation confirming Aisha's innocence and directing that charges of adultery be supported by four eyewitnesses.[111]





Siege of Medina
Main article: Battle of the Trench
Abu Sufyan, the military leader of Quraysh, with the help of Banu Nadir, the exiled Jewish tribe from Medina, had mustered a force of size 10000 men. Muhammad was able to prepare a force of about 3000 men. He had however adopted a new form of defense, unknown in Arabia at that time: Muslims had dug a trench wherever Medina lay open to cavalry attack. The idea is credited to a Persian convert to Islam, Salman. The siege of Medina began on 31 March 627 and lasted for two weeks.[112] Abu Sufyan's troops were unprepared for the fortifications they were confronted with, and after an ineffectual siege, the coalition decided to go home.[113]

During the Battle of the Trench, the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza who were located at the south of Medina were charged with treachery. After the retreat of the coalition, Muslims besieged Banu Qurayza, the remaining Jewish tribe in Medina. The Banu Qurayza surrendered and all the men, apart from a few who converted to Islam, were beheaded, while all the women and children were enslaved.[114][115] In dealing with Muhammad's treatment of the Jews of Medina, aside from political explanations, Arab historians and biographers have explained it as "the punishment of the Medina Jews, who were invited to convert and refused, perfectly exemplify the Quran's tales of what happened to those who rejected the prophets of old."[116] F.E. Peters, a western scholar of Islam, states that Muhammad's treatment of Jews of Medina was essentially political being prompted by what Muhammad read as treasonous and not some transgression of the law of God.[94] Peters adds that Muhammad was possibly emboldened by his military successes and also wanted to push his advantage. Economical motivations according to Peters also existed since the poorness of the Meccan migrants was a source of concern for Muhammad.[117] Peters argues that Muhammad's treatment of the Jews of Medina was "quite extraordinary", "matched by nothing in the Qur'an", and is "quite at odds with Muhammad's treatment of the Jews he encountered outside Medina."[94]

In the siege of Medina, the Meccans had exerted their utmost strength towards the destruction of the Muslim community. Their failure resulted in a significant loss of prestige; their trade with Syria was gone.[118]


Truce of Hudaybiyya
Main article: Treaty of Hudaybiyya
Although Muhammad had already delivered Qur'anic verses commanding the Hajj,[119] the Muslims had not performed it due to the enmity of the Quraysh. In the month of Shawwal 628, Muhammad ordered his followers to obtain sacrificial animals and to make preparations for a pilgrimage (umra) to Mecca, saying that God had promised him the fulfillment of this goal in a vision where he was shaving his head after the completion of the Hajj.[120] According to Lewis, Muhammad felt strong enough to attempt an attack on Mecca, but on the way it became clear that the attempt was premature and the expedition was converted into a peaceful pilgrimage.[121] Andrae disagrees, writing that the Muslim state of ihram (which restricted their freedom of action) and the paucity of arms carried indicated that the pilgrimage was always intended to be pacific.[122] Upon hearing of the approaching 1,400 Muslims, the Quraysh sent out a force of 200 cavalry to halt them. Muhammad evaded them by taking a more difficult route, thereby reaching al-Hudaybiyya, just outside of Mecca.[123] According to Watt, although Muhammad's decision to make the pilgrimage was based on his dream but he was at the same time demonstrating to the pagan Meccans that Islam does not threaten the prestige of their sanctuary, and that Islam was an Arabian religion. [124]

Negotiations commenced with emissaries going to and from Mecca. While these continued, rumors spread that one of the Muslim negotiators, Uthman bin al-Affan, had been killed by the Quraysh. Muhammad responded by calling upon the pilgrims to make a pledge not to flee (or to stick with Muhammad, whatever decision he made) if the situation descended into war with Mecca. This pledge became known as the "Pledge of Good Pleasure" (Arabic: بيعة الرضوان , bay'at al-ridhwān) or the "Pledge under the Tree." News of Uthman's safety, however, allowed for negotiations to continue, and a treaty scheduled to last ten years was eventually signed between the Muslims and Quraysh.[123][125] The main points of treaty were the following:

The two parties and their allies should desist from hostilities against each other[126]
Muhammad, should not perform Hajj this year[126]
They may come next year to perform Hajj (unarmed) but shall not stay in Mecca for more than three days[126]
Any Muslim living in Mecca cannot settle in Medina, but Medinan Muslims may come and join Meccans (and will not be returned).[126]
Many Muslims were not satisfied with the terms of the treaty. However, the Qur'anic sura "Al-Fath" (The Victory) (48:1-29) assured the Muslims that the expedition from which they were now returning must be considered a victorious one.[127] It was only later that Muhammad's followers would realise the benefit behind this treaty. These benefits, according to Welch, included the inducing of the Meccans to recognise Muhammad as an equal; a cessation of military activity posing well for the future; and gaining the admiration of Meccans who were impressed by the incorporation of the pilgrimage rituals.[16]

After signing the truce, Muhammad made an expedition against the Jewish oasis of Khaybar. The explanation given by western scholars of Islam for this attack ranges from the presence of the Banu Nadir in Khaybar, who were inciting hostilities along with neighboring Arab tribes against Muhammad, to deflecting from what appeared to some Muslims as the inconclusive result of the truce of Hudaybiyya, increasing Muhammad's prestige among his followers and capturing booty.[98][128] According to Muslim tradition, Muhammad also sent letters to many rulers of the world, asking them to convert to Islam.[129][130][131] Hence he sent messengers (with letters) to Heraclius of the Byzantine Empire (the eastern Roman Empire), Chosroes of Persia, the chief of Yemen and to some others.[129][130]


Conquest of Mecca
Main articles: Conquest of Mecca and Muhammad after the conquest of Mecca

The truce of Hudaybiyya had been enforced for two years.[132][133] The tribe of Khuz'aah had a friendly relationship with Muhammad, while on the other hand their enemies, the Banu Bakr, had an alliance with the Meccans.[132][133] A clan of the Bakr made a night raid against the Khuz'aah, killing a few of them.[132][133] The Meccans helped their allies (i.e., the Banu Bakr) with weapons and, according to some sources, a few Meccans also took part in the fighting.[132] After this event, Muhammad sent a message to Mecca with three conditions, asking them to accept one of them. These were the following[134]

The Meccans were to pay blood-money for those slain among the Khuza'ah tribe, or
They should have nothing to do with the Banu Bakr, or
They should declare the truce of Hudaybiyya null.
The Meccans replied that they would accept only the third condition.[134] However, soon they realized their mistake and sent Abu Safyan to renew the Hudaybiyya treaty, but now his request was declined by Muhammad. Muhammad began to prepare for a campaign.[135]

In 630, Muhammad marched on Mecca with an enormous force, said to number more than ten thousand men. With minimal casualties, Muhammad took control of Mecca.[136] He declared an amnesty for past offences, except for ten men and women who had mocked and made fun of him in songs and verses. Some of these were later pardoned.[137] Most Meccans converted to Islam, and Muhammad subsequently destroyed all of the statues of Arabian gods in and around the Kaaba, without any exception. Henceforth the pilgrimage would be a Muslim pilgrimage and the shrine was converted to a Muslim shrine.[citation needed]


Conquest of Arabia

The capitulation of Mecca and the defeat of an alliance of enemy tribes at Hunayn effectively brought the greater part of the Arabian peninsula under Muhammad's authority. However, this authority was not enforced by a regular government, as Muhammad chose instead to rule through personal relationships and tribal treaties. The Muslims were clearly the dominant force in Arabia, and most of the remaining tribes and states hastened to convert to Islam.[citation needed]


Death
In 632, Muhammad fell ill and suffered for several days with head pain and weakness. He succumbed on Monday, June 8, 632, in the city of Medina. He is buried in his tomb (which previously was in his wife Aisha's house) which is now housed within Mosque of the Prophet in Medina.[138]


Marriages and children
Main article: Muhammad's family
Part of a series on Islam:
The Wives of Muhammad
Khadijah bint Khuwaylid

Sawda bint Zama*

Aisha bint Abi Bakr*

Hafsa bint Umar

Zaynab bint Khuzayma

Umm Salama Hind bint Abi Umayya

Zaynab bint Jahsh

Juwayriya bint al-Harith

Ramlah bint Abi-Sufyan

Rayhana bint Amr ibn Khunafa**

Safiyya bint Huyayy

Maymuna bint al-Harith

Maria al-Qibtiyya**

*succession disputed

** status as wife or concubine is disputed

Muhammad's life is traditionally defined into two epochs: pre-hijra (emigration) in Mecca, a city in northern Arabia, from the year 570 to 622, and post-hijra in Medina, from 622 until his death in 632. Muhammad is said to have had thirteen wives or concubines (there are differing accounts on the status of some of them as wife or concubine [139])[140] All but two of his marriages were contracted after the migration to Medina.

At the age of 25, Muhammad married Khadijah which lasted for 25 years.[141] This marriage is described as "long" and "happy," and he relied upon Khadija in many ways.[142][143] Muhammad did not enter into marriage with another woman during his marriage with Khadija. After her death, friends of Muhammad advised him to marry again, but he was reluctant to do so.[143][142] It was suggested to Muhammad by Khawla bint Hakim, that he should marry Sawda bint Zama, a Muslim widow, or Aisha. Muhammad is said to have asked her to arrange for him to marry both. [144] Later, Muhammad married additional wives nine of whom survived him.[140]

In Arabian culture, marriage was generally contracted in accordance with the larger needs of the tribe and was based on the need to form alliances within the tribe and with other tribes. Virginity at the time of marriage was emphasized as a tribal honor.[145] Watt states that all of Muhammad's marriages had the political aspect of strengthening friendly relationships and were based on the Arabian custom. [146] Esposito points out that some of Muhammad's marriages were aimed at providing a livelihood for widows.[147] F.E. Peters says that it is hard to make generalizations about Muhammad's marriages: many of them were political, some compassionate, and some perhaps affairs of heart.[148]

Muhammad is said to have done his own household chores, helped out with the housework, such preparing food, sewing clothes, and repairing shoes. Muhammad is said to had accustomed his wives to dialogue; he listened to their advice, and the wives debated and even argued with him.[149][150]

Khadijah is said to have borne Muhammad four daughters (Ruqayyah bint Muhammad,Umm Kulthum bint Muhammad,Zainab bint Muhammad,Fatima Zahra) and two sons (Abd-Allah ibn Muhammad and Qasim ibn Muhammad), though all except two of his daughters, Fatima and Zaynab died before him. Maria al-Qibtiyya bore him a son named Ibrahim ibn Muhammad, but the child died when he was two years old.[151]


Companions
Main articles: Sahaba and Salaf
The term Sahaba (companion) refers to anyone who meets three criteria: to be a contemporary of Muhammad, to have heard Muhammad speak on at least one occasion, and to be a convert to Islam. Companions are considered the ultimate sources for the oral traditions, or hadith, on which much of Muslim law and practice are based. The following are a few examples in alphabetic order:

Abdullah ibn Abbas
Abu Bakr
Abu Dharr
Ali ibn Abi Talib
Ammar
Bilal
Hamza
Khalid ibn al-Walid
Sa'd
Zayd
Salman the Persian
Talha
Umar
Uthman
Zubair



Muhammad the reformer
Main article: Early reforms under Islam
According to William Montgomery Watt, for Muhammad, religion was not a private and individual matter but rather “the total response of his personality to the total situation in which he found himself. He was responding [not only]… to the religious and intellectual aspects of the situation but also to the economic, social, and political pressures to which contemporary Mecca was subject."[152]

Bernard Lewis says that there are two important political traditions in Islam — one that views Muhammad as a statesman in Medina, and another that views him as a rebel in Mecca. He sees Islam itself as a type of revolution that greatly changed the societies into which the new religion was brought.[153]

Historians generally agree that Islamic social reforms in areas such as social security, family structure, slavery and the rights of women and children improved on what was present in existing Arab society.[153][154] For example, according to Lewis, Islam "from the first denounced aristocratic privilege, rejected hierarchy, and adopted a formula of the career open to the talents"[153]

Muhammad's message transformed the society and moral order of life in the Arabian Peninsula through reorientation of society as regards to identity, world view, and the hierarchy of values.[155]

Economic reforms addressed the plight of the poor, which was becoming an issue in pre-Islamic Mecca.[156] The Qur'an requires payment of an alms tax (zakat) for the benefit of the poor,[157] and as Muhammad's position grew in power he demanded that those tribes who wanted to ally with him implement the zakat in particular.[158]


Miracles in the Muslim biographies
Main article: Islamic view of miracles
According to historian Denis Gril, the Qur'an does not overtly describe Muhammad performing miracles, and the supreme miracle of Muhammad is finally identified with the Qur’an itself. [159] However, Muslim tradition credits Muhammad with several supernatural events.[160] For example, many Muslim commentators and some western scholars have interpreted the Surah 54:1-2 to refer to Muhammad splitting the Moon in view of the Quraysh when they had begun to persecute his followers.[159][161] This tradition has inspired many Muslim poets, especially in India.[16]

Modern Muslim biographies of Muhammad more often portray him as a progressive social and political reformer, successful military leader and model of human virtue.[162] According to Carl Ernst, Muslims began to de-emphasize superhuman views of Muhammad following the growth of scientific rationalism in Muslim countries.[163] Daniel Brown adds that Muslims of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, faced with social and political turmoil and the challenge of reforming Islamic law, began looking to Muhammad's life for examples which might more practically address these problems.[162]


Traditional views of Muhammad
Muslims have traditionally expressed love and veneration for Muhammad. Stories of Muhammad's life, his intercession and of his miracles (particularly "Splitting of the moon") have permeated popular Muslim thought and poetry. The Qur'an refers to Muhammad as "a mercy (rahmat) to the worlds" [Qur'an 21:107].[16] The association of rain with rahmat (mercy) in Oriental countries has led to imagination of Muhammad as a rain cloud dispensing blessing and stretching over lands, reviving the dead hearts, just as rain revives the seemingly dead earth (see for example the Sindhi poem of Shah ʿAbd al-Latif).[16] The story of ascension of Muhammad to heaven (mi'radj) is described in much details by poems in Turkey, India, Africa and other countries. The folk traditions contain miracles attributed to Muhammad not mentioned in the Qur'an (such as trees bowing before Muhammad, or a cloud protecting him from the sun).[16]

Muslims, especially Sufi Muslims, regard Muhammad as God's last messenger, and al-insan al-kamil, meaning, the "perfect man".[164] There are legends telling of how the whole world was filled with light at Muhammad's birth.[16]


Seal of the prophets

Inscribed inside the names are Qur'anic verses; the one inside the word "Allah" is the Ayat-ul-Kursi and the one inscribed inside the word "Muhammad" asserts that Muhammad is the last prophet.

Muslims believe Muhammad to be the last in a line of prophets of God (Arabic Allah) and regard his mission as one of restoring the original monotheistic faith of Adam, Abraham and other prophets of Islam that had become altered by man over time.[15][16][10] The Qur'an specifically refers to Muhammad as the "Seal of the Prophets", which is taken by most Muslims to believe him to be the last of the prophets.[166][167][168][23] Welch however holds that this Muslim belief is most likely a later interpretation of the Seal of the Prophets.[16] Carl Ernst considers this phrase to mean that Muhammad's "imprint on history is as final as a wax seal on a letter".[23] Wilferd Madelung states that the meaning of this term is not certain.[169]


Depictions of Muhammad
Main article: Depictions of Muhammad
Islam forbids visual depictions of Muhammad.[170] That strict taboo is honored today by almost all Muslims.[171] The taboo is stronger in Sunni Islam (representing 85–90% of the world’s Muslim population) than Shia (10–15%).[20]

Figurative art of Muhammad was a significant part of late medieval Islamic art; however, it was generally limited to secular contexts and to the elite classes who could afford fine art.[19] Depictions of Muhammad were common during the Ottoman Empire, when the taboo on portraying him was less strong, although his face was often left blank.[20]


Muslim veneration of Muhammad
See also: Muslim veneration for Muhammad, Naat, Depiction of Muhammad, Islamic music, and Qawwali

It is traditional for Muslims to illustrate and express love and veneration for Muhammad. Muhammad's birthday is celebrated as a major feast throughout the Islamic world, excluding the Wahhabi-dominated Saudi Arabia where these public celebrations are discouraged. In these celebrations, Muslims remember the miracles associated with Muhammad's life, "repeat the Qur'anic dictum that Muhammad was sent as 'mercy unto all the worlds', ask for his intercession on the Day of Judgment, hoping to assemble that day under the green 'flag of praise' carried by him." [172]

Muslim experience Muhammad as a living reality believing in his ongoing relation with human beings as well as animals and plants. Seyyed Hossein Nasr states: [172]

The benediction upon the Prophet punctuates daily Muslim life, and traditional Islamic life reminds one at every turn of his ubiquitous presence. He even plays a major role in dreams. There are many prayers recited in order to be able to have a dream of the Prophet, who promised that the Devil could never appear in a dream in the form of Muhammad. Not only for saints and mystics but also for many ordinary pious people, a simple dream of the Prophet has been able to transform a whole human life. One might say that the reality of the Prophet penetrates the life of Muslims on every level, from the external existence of the individual and of Islamic society as a whole to the life of the psyche and the soul and finally to the life of the spirit.

When Muslims say or write the name of Muhammad or any other Muslim prophet, they usually follow it with Peace be upon him or its Arabic equivalent, sallalahu alayhi wasallam,[173] and for Shias this is extended to Peace be upon him and his descendants. In English this is often abbreviated to "(pbuh)", "(saw)" and "pbuh&hd" for Shias, or even just simply as "p".


Christian and Western views of Muhammad
Main article: Christian view of Muhammad
While Muslim writers have tended to speak highly of Muhammad, Western tradition has at times been critical of him.[174][175]


Popular image of Muhammad in medieval times
In the 12th century, Chansons de geste that mentioned Muhammad presented him as an idol to whom Muslims prayed for aid in battle.[16][176] Some medieval Christians said he had died in 666, alluding to the number of the beast, instead of 632;[177] others changed his name from Muhammad to Mahound, the "devil incarnate".[178] Bernard Lewis writes "The development of the concept of Mahound started with considering Muhammad as a kind of demon or false god worshipped with Apollyon and Termangant in an unholy trinity."[179] To discredit Islam, Muhammad was represented as an idol or one of the heathen gods during the first and second Crusade.[16]


Later medieval representations
From the middle of the 13th century, mentions of Muhammad in vernacular chivalric romance literature begin to appear. A poem represents Muhammad as "someone in bondage. Through his cleverly contrived marriage to the widow of his former master, he not only attains his freedom and wealth but also knows how to cover up his epileptic attacks as phenomena accompanying visitations of angels and to pose as a new messenger of God's will through deceitful machinations."[16] From this period is Scala Mahomete, a translation of an Arabic text, largely without Christian evaluations.[16] In a polemical tone, Livre dou Tresor represents Muhammad as a former monk and cardinal.[16] Dante's The Divine Comedy (Canto XXVIII), puts Muhammad, together with Ali, in Hell "among the sowers of discord and the schismatics, being lacerated by devils again and again."[16]


Early modern times
After the reformation, Muhammad was no longer viewed as a god or idol, but as a cunning, ambitious, and self-seeking impostor.[179][16]

Guillaume Postel was among the first to present a more positive view of Muhammad.[16] Boulainvilliers described Muhammad as a gifted political leader and a just lawmaker.[16] Leibniz praised Muhammad because "he did not deviate from the natural religion".[16]


Modern times
Friedrich Bodenstedt (1851) described Muhammad as "an ominous destroyer and a prophet of murder."[16]

According to Watt and Richard Bell, recent writers have generally dismissed the idea that Muhammad deliberately deceived his followers, arguing that Muhammad “was absolutely sincere and acted in complete good faith”.[180] Watt says that sincerity does not directly imply correctness: In contemporary terms, Muhammad might have mistaken for divine revelation his own unconscious.[181] Although Muhammad's image in the west is much less unfavorable than in the past, prejudicial folk beliefs remain.[182]

Watt and Lewis argue that viewing Muhammad as a self-seeking imposter makes it impossible to understand the development of Islam.[183][184] Welch holds that Muhammad was able to be so influential and successful because of his firm belief in his vocation.[16] Muhammad’s readiness to endure hardship for his cause when there seemed to be no rational basis for hope shows his sincerity.[185]

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints considers Muhammad, along with Confucius, the Reformers, as well as philosophers including Socrates, Plato, and others, to have received a portion of God´s light and that moral truths were given to them to enlighten nations and bring a higher level of understanding to individuals.[186]


Other religious traditions in regard to Muhammad
The Druze, who accept most but not all Qur'anic revelations, also consider him a prophet.
Bahá'ís venerate Muhammad as one of a number of prophets or "Manifestations of God", but consider his teachings to have been superseded by those of Bahá'u'lláh.

See also
Arabian tribes that interacted with Muhammad
Depictions of Muhammad
Criticism of Muhammad
Hadith
Hanif
Islam
Islamic view of Muhammad
Paraclete
Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy
List of films about Muhammad
Mohammad, Messenger of God (aka The Message)
Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet (documentary)
List of founders of world religions
List of Islamic terms in Arabic
Muezza
Sira
Rasul
Early reforms under Islam
Early Islamic philosophy



Notes
^ Muhittin Serin: Hattat Aziz Efendi, Istanbul (1988, 1999), ISBN 9-7576-6303-4, OCLC 51718704
^ Unicode has a special "Muhammad" ligature at U+FDF4 ﷴ
^ click here (help·info) for the Arabic pronunciation.
^ Variants of Muhammad's name in French: "Mahon, Mahomés, Mahun, Mahum, Mahumet"; in German: "Machmet"; and in Old Icelandic: "Maúmet" cf Muhammad, Encyclopedia of Islam
^ Welch, noting the frequency of Muhammad being called as "Al-Amin"(Arabic: الأمين ), a common Arab name, suggests the possibility of "Al-Amin" being Muhammad's given name as it is a masculine form from the same root as his mother's name, A'mina. cf. "Muhammad", Encyclopedia of Islam Online; The sources frequently say that he, in his youth, was called by the nickname "Al-Amin" meaning "Honest, Truthful" cf. Ernst (2004), p. 85.
^ Elizabeth Goldman (1995). Believers: spiritual leaders of the world. Oxford University Press, 63.
^ The Cambridge History of Islam (1977) writes that "It is appropriate to use the word 'God' rather than the transliteration 'Allah'. For one thing it cannot be denied that Islam is an offshoot of the Judaeo-Christians tradition, and for another the Christian Arabs of today have no other word for 'God' than 'Allah'." cf p. 32.
^ Esposito (1998), p. 12.
^ Esposito (2002b), pp. 4–5.
^ a b c d e F. E. Peters (2003), p. 9.
^ Alphonse de Lamartine (1854), Historie de la Turquie, Paris, p. 280:
"Philosophe, orateur, apôtre, législateur, guerrier, conquérant d'idées, restaurateur de dogmes, d'un culte sans images, fondateur de vingt empires terrestres et d'un empire spirituel, voilà Mahomet!"

^ a b Encyclopedia of World History (1998), p. 452
^ The word "islām" derives from the triconsonantal Arabic root sīn-lām-mīm, which carries the basic meaning of safety and peace. The verbal noun "islām" is formed from the verb aslama, a derivation of this root which means to accept, surrender, or submit; thus, 'Islam' effectively means submission to and acceptance of God. See: Islam#Etymology and meaning
^ 'Islam' is always referred to in the Qur'an as a 'dīn', a word that means 'way' or 'path' in Arabic, but is usually translated in English as 'religion' for the sake of convenience
^ a b Esposito (1998), p. 12; (1999) p. 25; (2002) pp. 4–5
^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai "Muhammad", Encyclopedia of Islam Online
^ After Muhammad's migration to Yathrib, the city came to be known as Madina al-Nabi, lit. 'City of the Prophet'; hence, the name Medina
^ The term Qur'an was first used in the Qur'an itself. There are two different theories about this term and its formation that are discussed in Quran#Etymology cf. "Qur'an", Encyclopedia of Islam Online.
^ a b Islamic Figurative Art and Depictions of Muhammad. Retrieved on 2008-01-02.
^ a b c Browne, Anthony; Gledhill, Ruth (2006-02-04). Portraying prophet from Persian art to South Park. The Times. Retrieved on 2008-01-02.
^ Dan McCormack. Online Etymology Dictionary. Douglas Harper. Retrieved on August 14, 2006.
^ There are reports of other Arabs before Muhammad who were named "Muhammad" (e.g. Ibn Sa'd). Welch (cf. "Muhammad", "Encyclopedia of Islam") accepts usage of the name "Muhammad" among Arabs but also points out that these reports have a tendentious nature. For example Ibn Sa'd's report has the heading, "Account of those who were named Muhammad in the days of the jahilliya Pre-Islamic Arabia in the hope of being called to prophethood which had been predicted."
^ a b c Ernst (2004), p. 80
^ Ali, Wijdan. "From the Literal to the Spiritual: The Development of Prophet Muhammad's Portrayal from 13th century Ilkhanid Miniatures to 17th century Ottoman Art". In Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Turkish Art, eds. M. Kiel, N. Landman, and H. Theunissen. No. 7, 1–24. Utrecht, The Netherlands, August 23–28, 1999, p. 7
^ a b Reeves (2003), pp. 6–7
^ a b c d Islam, S. A. Nigosian, p. 6 , Indiana University Press
^ Encyclopedia of Islam, Muhammad
^ The Cambridge History of Islam (1977), p. 32
^ F. E. Peters, The Quest for Historical Muhammad, International Journal of Middle East Studies (1991) pp. 291–315.
^ a b William Montgomery Watt, Muhammad in Mecca, Oxford University Press, p.xi
^ Donner (1998), p. 132
^ William Montgomery Watt, Muhammad in Mecca, Oxford University Press, p.xii
^ Lewis (1993), pp. 33–34
^ Ar-Raheeq Al-Makhtum: The Lineage and Family of Muhammad by Saifur Rahman al-Mubarakpuri
^ See also [Qur'an 43:31] cited in EoI; Muhammad
^ a b c William Montgomery Watt (1974), p. 7.
^ By Mufti Taqi Usmani.
^ Allameh Tabatabaei, A glance at the life of the holy prophet of Islam, p. 20
^ Josef W. Meri (2005), p. 525
^ William Montgomery Watt, "Halimah bint Abi Dhuayb", Encyclopaedia of Islam
^ William Montgomery Watt, Amina, Encyclopaedia of Islam
^ a b William Montgomery Watt (1974), p. 8.
^ a b Chris Charles Park (1994), p. 266.
^ William Montgomery Watt, Muhammad, Prophet and Statesman, p. 8.
^ a b Berkshire Encyclopedia of World History (2005), v.3, p. 1025
^ Esposito (1998), p. 6
^ Ali, Wijdan. "From the Literal to the Spiritual: The Development of Prophet Muhammad's Portrayal from 13th century Ilkhanid Miniatures to 17th century Ottoman Art". In Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Turkish Art, eds. M. Kiel, N. Landman, and H. Theunissen. No. 7, 1–24. Utrecht, The Netherlands, August 23–28, 1999, p. 3
^ Ordoni (1990) pp. 32, 42–44.
^ FE Peters (2003), p. 54.
^ Jonathan M. Bloom, Sheila S. Blair (2002), p. 28–29
^ Brown (2003), pp. 72–73
^ Rodinson, p. 71.
^ Brown (2003), pp. 73–74
^ The Cambridge History of Islam (1977), p. 31.
^ Le Prophète Mahomet. Bibliothèque nationale de France. Retrieved on 03-02-2007.
^ a b William Montgomery Watt (1953), p. 86
^ a b c The Cambridge History of Islam (1977), p. 36.
^ a b Welch, Muhammad, Encyclopedia of Islam.
^ The Cambridge History of Islam (1977), p. 37
^ Encyclopedia of the Qur'an, Slaves and Slavery
^ Bilal b. Rabah, Encyclopedia of Islam
^ Watt (1964) p. 76.
^ Peters (1999) p. 172.
^ Some early Islamic histories recount that as Muhammad was reciting Sūra Al-Najm (Q.53), as revealed to him by the angel Gabriel, Satan tempted him to utter the following lines after verses 19 and 20: "Have you thought of Allāt and al-'Uzzā and Manāt the third, the other; These are the exalted Gharaniq, whose intercession is hoped for." (Allāt, al-'Uzzā and Manāt were three goddesses worshiped by the Meccans). cf Ibn Ishaq, A. Guillaume p. 166.
^ EoQ, Satanic Verses, Shahab Ahmed
^ Francis E. Peters, The Monotheists: Jews, Christians, and Muslims in Conflict and Competition, p. 96
^ a b c Moojan Momen, An Introduction to Shi'i Islam: The History and Doctrines of Twelver Shiʻism, Yale University Press, p. 4
^ Encyclopedia of Islam and the Muslim World (2003), p. 482
^ a b c d The Cambridge History of Islam (1977), p. 39
^ a b Esposito (1998), p. 17.
^ Moojan Momen, An Introduction to Shi'i Islam: The History and Doctrines of Twelver Shiʻism, Yale University Press, p. 5
^ Muhammad, Encyclopedia of Islam
^ Fazlur Rahman, Islam, Chicago University Press, p. 21
^ William Montgomery Watt, Muhammad in Medina, pp. 175, 177.
^ Norman Stillman, Yahud, Encyclopedia of Islam
^ Lewis, "The Arabs in History," 2003, p. 44.
^ Francis E. Peters, Muhammad and the Origins of Islam, p. 211.
^ Montgomery Watt, Muhammad, Prophet and Statesman, Oxford University Press, 1961, p. 105.
^ Montgomery Watt, Muhammad at Medina, p. 2.
^ John Kelsay, Islam and War: A Study in Comparative Ethics, p. 21
^ Watt, Muhammad, Prophet and Statesman, Oxford University Press, 1961, p. 105, 107
^ Bernard Lewis (1993), p. 41.
^ Rodinson, p. 164.
^ The Cambridge History of Islam, p. 45
^ Glubb (2002), pp. 179–186.
^ Watt (1961), pp. 122–3.
^ a b Watt (1961), p. 123.
^ a b Maxime Rodinson, Muhammad, pp. 168–9.
^ Lewis, "The Arabs in History," p. 44.
^ Watt (1956), p. 179.
^ Endress (2003), p. 29
^ a b c The Cambridge History of Islam (1977), pp. 43–44
^ Cohen (1995), p. 23
^ a b c Francis Edward Peters (2003), p. 194.
^ Watt (1961), p. 132.
^ Watt (1964), pp. 124–125
^ Watt (1961), p. 134
^ a b Lewis (1960), p. 45.
^ Rodinson, pp. 177, 180.
^ "Uhud", Encyclopedia of Islam.
^ Watt (1964) p. 137
^ Watt (1974) p. 137
^ Watt (1974) p. 141
^ Rodinson, p. 183.
^ Watt (1964) p. 144.
^ a b Watt, Muhammad in Medina, p. 30.
^ Watt, Muhammad in Medina, p. 34
^ Watt, Muhammad in Medina, p. 18
^ Watt, Muhammad in Medina, pp. 220–221
^ Watt, Muhammad in Medina, p. 35
^ Watt, M "Aisha bint Abi Bakr". Encyclopaedia of Islam Online. Ed. P.J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W.P. Heinrichs. Brill Academic Publishers. ISSN 1573-3912.
^ Watt, Muhammad in Medina, p. 36, 37
^ Rodinson, pp. 209–211.
^ Peterson, Muhammad: the prophet of God, p. 126
^ Tariq Ramadan, In the Footsteps of the Prophet, Oxford University Press, p. 141
^ Francis Edwards Peters (2003), p. 77
^ F.E.Peters (2003), pp. 76–8.
^ Watt, Muhammad in Medina, p. 39
^ [Qur'an 2:196-210]
^ Lings (1987), p. 249
^ Lewis (2002), p. 42.
^ Andrae; Menzel (1960) p. 156; See also: Watt (1964) p. 183
^ a b "al-Hudaybiya", Encyclopedia of Islam
^ Watt, W. Montgomery. "al- Hudaybiya or al-Hudaybiyya." Encyclopaedia of Islam.
^ Lewis (2002), p. 42.
^ a b c d Lings (1987), p. 253
^ Lings (1987), p. 255
^ Veccia Vaglieri, L. "Khaybar", Encyclopaedia of Islam
^ a b Lings (1987), p. 260
^ a b Khan (1998), pp. 250–251
^ Haykal (1995), p. 360
^ a b c d Khan (1998), p. 274
^ a b c Lings (1987), p. 291
^ a b Khan (1998), pp. 274–5.
^ Lings (1987), p. 292
^ Watt, Muhammad in Medina. 1956, p. 66.
^ Rodinson, p. 261.
^ Leila Ahmed (Summer 1986). "Women and the Advent of Islam". Signs 11: 665–91 (686). Retrieved on 2007-06-19.
^ See for example Marco Schöller, Banu Qurayza, Encyclopedia of the Quran mentioning the differing accounts of the status of Rayhana
^ a b Barbara Freyer Stowasser, Wives of the Prophet, Encyclopedia of the Quran
^ Esposito (1998), p. 18
^ a b Bullough (1998), p. 119
^ a b Reeves (2003), p. 46
^ Watt, "Aisha", Encyclopedia of Islam Online
^ Amira Sonbol, Rise of Islam: 6th to 9th century, Encyclopedia of Women & Islamic Cultures
^ William Montgomery Watt, Muhammad in Medina, p.287
^ Esposito (1998), pp. 16–8.
^ F. E. Peters, Islam, a Guide for Jews and Christians, Princeton University Press, p.84
^ Tariq Ramadan (2007), p. 168-9
^ Asma Barlas, Believing Women in Islam, University of Texas Press, p.125
^ Nicholas Awde,Women in Islam: An Anthology from the Quran and Hadith,Routledge, p.10
^ Cambridge History of Islam (1970), p. 30.
^ a b c Lewis, Bernard. "Islamic Revolution", The New York Review of Books, January 21, 1998.
^
Watt (1974), p. 234
Robinson (2004) p. 21
Esposito (1998), p. 98
Ak̲h̲lāḳ, Encyclopaedia of Islam Online
^ Islamic ethics, Encyclopedia of Ethics
^ The Cambridge History of Islam (1977), p. 34
^ Esposito (1998), p. 30
^ The Cambridge History of Islam (1977), p. 52
^ a b Denis Gril, Miracles, Encyclopedia of the Qur'an
^ A.J. Wensinck, Muʿd̲j̲iza, Encyclopedia of Islam
^ Encyclopedia of the Qur'an, Moon
^ a b Brown (1999), p. 65
^ Ernst (2004), p. 84
^ "Muhammad and Sufism" (HTML), Encyclopædia Britannica. "The Mi'raj, or Nocturnal Ascent, of the Prophet is the prototype of all spiritual wayfaring in Islam, and no group in Islamic society has been as conscientious as the Sufis in emulating the Prophet as the perfect saint and what later Sufis were to call the Perfect or Universal Man (al-insan al-kamil)."
^ Ilah is also translated as Deity, and means god in the sense of where there can be more than one, in plural, like the Roman gods, Allah, on the other hand, can be translated as 'The God', and can only mean God where there is one, alone
^ Friedmann, 'Finality of Prophethood'
^ G.G. Stroumsa, 'Seal of the prophets: The Nature of a Manichaen Metaphor', JSAI, 7 (1986), 61–74.
^ C.Colpe, 'Das Siegel der Propheten', Orientalia Suecana, 33–5 (1984–6), 71–83, revised version in C.Colpe, Das Siegel der Propheten, (Berlin, 1990), 227–43
^ Madelung (2004), p. 17
^ Ostling, Richard N, AP Religion Writer (2006-02-02). Islam Forbids Visual Depiction of Muhammad. San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved on 2008-02-02.
^ Richard, Paul. "In Art Museums, Portraits Illuminate A Religious Taboo", The Washington Post, 2006-02-14, p. p. C01. Retrieved on 2008-01-02.
^ a b Seyyed Hossein Nasr, Encyclopedia Britannica, Muhammad, p.13
^ Ann Goldman, Richard Hain, Stephen Liben,Oxford Textbook of Palliative Care for Children, Oxford University Press, p.212
^ Esposito (1998), p. 14.
^ Watt (1974), p. 231.
^ Some other sources depicting Muhammad as an idol:
Cycle de Guillaume d'Orange
Willehalm of Wolfram von Eschenbach
History of Ulrich von dem Türlin
Rennewart of Ulrich von Türheim
Stricker's Karl der Große
Karlamagnus saga
Partonopier und Meliur of Konrad of Würzburg
^ Göran Larsson, Ibn Garcia's Shu'Ubiyya Letter: Ethnic and Theological Tensions in Medieval Al-Andalus, Brill Academic Publishers, p. 87
^ Reeves (2003), p. 3
^ a b Lewis (2002) p. 45.
^ Watt, Bell (1995) p. 18
^ Watt, Muhammad Prophet and Statesman, p. 17
^ Watt (1974) p. 231.
^ Watt, The Cambridge history of Islam, p. 37
^ Bernard W Lewis (1993), The Arabs in History, p. 45.
^ Watt, Muhammad the prophet and the statesman, p. 232
^ James A. Toronto (August 2000). A Latter-day Saint Perspective on Muhammad. Ensign. Retrieved on 2007-11-19.

References
Accad, Martin (2003). "The Gospels in the Muslim Discourse of the Ninth to the Fourteenth Centuries: An Exegetical Inventorial Table (Part I)". Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 14 (1).
Ali, Wijdan. "From the Literal to the Spiritual: The Development of Prophet Muhammad's Portrayal from 13th century Ilkhanid Miniatures to 17th century Ottoman Art". In Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Turkish Art, eds. M. Kiel, N. Landman, and H. Theunissen. No. 7, 1–24. Utrecht, The Netherlands, August 23–28, 1999.
Arafat, W. N. (1976). "Did Prophet Muhammad ordered 900 Jews killed?". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (JRAS): 100–107.
Bloom, Jonathan; Blair, Sheila (2002). Islam: A Thousand Years of Faith and Power. Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-09422-1.
Brown, Daniel (2003). A New Introduction to Islam. Blackwell Publishing Professional. ISBN 978-0631216049.
Brown, Daniel (1999). Rethinking Tradition in Modern Islamic Thought. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-65394-0.
Bullough, Vern L; Brenda Shelton, Sarah Slavin (1998). The Subordinated Sex: A History of Attitudes Toward Women. University of Georgia Press. ISBN 978-0820323695.
Cohen, Mark R. (1995). Under Crescent and Cross, Reissue edition, Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691010823.
Crow, Karim (2005). Facing One Qiblah: Legal and Doctrinal Aspects of Sunny and Shi'ah Muslims. Ibex Publishers. ISBN 9971-77-552-2.
Donner, Fred (1998). Narratives of Islamic Origins: The Beginnings of Islamic Historical Writing. Darwin Press. ISBN 0-87850-127-4.
Endress, Gerhard (2003). Islam. New Age Books. ISBN 978-8178221564.
Ernst, Carl (2004). Following Muhammad: Rethinking Islam in the Contemporary World. University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 0-8078-5577-4.
Esposito, John (1998). Islam: The Straight Path. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-511233-4.
Esposito, John (1999). The Islamic Threat: Myth Or Reality?. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-513076-6.
Esposito, John (2004). The Oxford Dictionary of Islam. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 978-0195125597.
Esposito, John (2002). What Everyone Needs to Know About Islam. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-515713-3.
Glubb, John Bagot (1970 (reprint 2002)). The Life and Times of Muhammad. Hodder & Stoughton. ISBN 0-8154-1176-6.
Haykal, Muhammad Husayn (1995). The Life of Muhammad. Islamic Book Service. ISBN 1-57731-195-7.
Holt, P. M.; Ann K. S. Lambton, Bernard Lewis (1977). The Cambridge History of Islam (Paperback). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521291354.
Hourani, Albert (2003). A History of the Arab Peoples, Revised edition, Belknap Press. ISBN 978-0674010178.
Ishaq, Ibn (2002). The Life of Muhammad: A Translation of Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0196360331.
Khan, Majid Ali (1998). Muhammad The Final Messenger. Islamic Book Service, New Delhi, 110002 (India). ISBN 81-85738-25-4.
Lewis, Bernard (2002). The Arabs in History. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-280310-7.
Lewis, Bernard (1992). Race and Slavery in the Middle East: An History Enquiry, Reprint edition, Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 978-0195053265.
Lings, Martin (1987). Muhammad: His Life Based on Earliest Sources. Inner Traditions International, Limited .. ISBN 0-89281-170-6.
Madelung, William (2004). The Succession to Muhammad. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521561815.
Muir, William (1878). Life of Mahomet. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 0-7661-7741-6.
Neusner, Jacob (2003). God's Rule: The Politics of World Religions. Georgetown University Press. ISBN 978-0878409105.
Ordoni, Abu Muhammad; Muhammad Kazim Qazwini (1992). Fatima the Gracious. Ansariyan Publications. ISBN B000BWQ7N6.
Peters, Francis Edward (2003). Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-11553-2.
Reeves, Minou (2003). Muhammad in Europe: A Thousand Years of Western Myth-Making. NYU Press. ISBN 978-0814775646.
Robinson, David (2004). Muslim Societies in African History. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 052153366X.
Schimmel, Annemarie (1992). Islam: An Introduction. SUNY Press. ISBN 0-7914-1327-6.
Schimmel, Annemarie (1995). Mystische Dimensionen des Islam. Insel, Frankfurt. ISBN 3458334157.
Stark, Rodney (2003). For the Glory of God: How Monotheism Led to Reformations, Science, Witch-Hunts, and the End of Slavery. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-11436-6.
Tucker, Judith E.; Nashat, Guity (1999). Women in the Middle East and North Africa. Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-21264-2.
Warraq, Ibn (1995). Why I Am Not a Muslim. Prometheus Books. ISBN 0879759844.
Watt, W. Montgomery (1961). Muhammad: Prophet and Statesman. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-881078-4.
Watt, W. Montgomery (1974). Muhammad: Prophet and Statesman, New Edition, Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-881078-4. .

Encyclopedias
Berkshire Encyclopedia of World History. (2005). Ed. William H. McNeill, Jerry H. Bentley, David Christian. Berkshire Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0974309101.
Encyclopedia of Islam & the Muslim World. (2003). Ed. Richard C. Martin, Said Amir Arjomand, Marcia Hermansen, Abdulkader Tayob, Rochelle Davis, John Obert Voll. MacMillan Reference Books. ISBN 978-0028656038.
Encyclopaedia of Islam Online. Ed. P.J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, W.P. Heinrichs. Brill Academic Publishers. ISSN 1573-3912.
Encyclopedia of Religion (2nd edition). (2005). Ed. Lindsay Jones. MacMillan Reference Books. ISBN 978-0028657332.
Encyclopedia of the Qur'an. (2005). Ed. Jane Dammen McAuliffe. Brill Academic Publishers. ISBN 978-9004123564.
Encyclopedia of World History. (1998). Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198602235.
The New Encyclopedia Britannica (Rev Ed edition). (2005). Encyclopedia Britannica, Incorporated. ISBN 978-1593392369.

Further reading
Adil Salahi (2002). Muhammad: Man and Prophet. Islamic Foundation (UK). ISBN 186204290X.
Andrae, Tor (2000). Mohammed: The Man and His Faith. Dover. ISBN 0-486-41136-2.
Armstrong, Karen (1993). Muhammad: A Biography of the Prophet. San Francisco: Harper. ISBN 0-06-250886-5.
Berg, Herbert, ed. (2003). Method and Theory in the Study of Islamic Origins. E. J. Brill. ISBN 90-04-12602-3.
Cook, Michael (1983). Muhammad. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-287605-8 (reissue 1996).
Dashti, Ali (1994). Twenty-Three Years: A Study of the Prophetic Career of Mohammad. Mazda. ISBN 1-56859-029-6.
Hamidullah, Muhammad (1998). The Life and Work of the Prophet of Islam. (s.n.)(Islamabad: Islamic Research Institute). ISBN 969-8413-00-6.
Motzki, Harald, ed. (2000). The Biography of Muhammad: The Issue of the Sources (Islamic History and Civilization: Studies and Texts, Vol. 32). Brill. ISBN 90-04-11513-7.
Rodinson, Maxime (1961). Muhammad. New Publishers. ISBN 1-56584-752-0.
Rodinson, Maxime (2002). Muhammad: Prophet of Islam. Tauris Parke Paperbacks. ISBN 1-86064-827-4.
Rubin, Uri (1995). The Eye of the Beholder: The Life of Muhammad as Viewed by the Early Muslims (A Textual Analysis). Darwin Press. ISBN 0-87850-110-X.
Schimmel, Annemarie (1985). And Muhammad is His Messenger: The Veneration of the Prophet in Islamic Piety. The University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 0-8078-4128-5.
Stillman, Norman (1975). The Jews of Arab Lands: a History and Source Book. Jewish Publication Society of America. ISBN 0-8276-0198-0.
Warraq, Ibn (2000). The Quest for the Historical Muhammad. Prometheus Books. ISBN 1-57392-787-2.

External Links
Find more about Muhammad on Wikipedia's sister projects:
Dictionary definitions
Textbooks
Quotations
Source texts
Images and media
News stories
Learning resources
Non-sectarian biographies
Muhammad, article on Encyclopaedia Britannica Online
Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet — PBS Site
Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet — UPF (Producer's Site)
Encarta Encyclopedia
1911 Encyclopedia article on Mahomet
William Muir: The Life of Mahomet
The Hero as Prophet A passionate championship of Prophet Muhammad as a Hegelian agent of reform. by Carlyle, Thomas (1795–1881) On Heroes and the Heroic in History. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press, 1966.
Muslim biographies
Ar-Raheeq Al-Makhtum (The Sealed Nectar)
PDF version of Ar-Raheeq Al-Makhtum
The Life of Muhammad by Muhammad Husayn Haykal
About the Prophet Muhammad (University of Southern California)
Muhammad
Banu Hashim
Cadet branch of the Banu Quraysh
Died: June 8 632